Talk:Mad TV season 4

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: DC Comics Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

I remember in an episode where Will Sasso won a walk on role for the show. He prepared some questions for the cast and asked Nicole Sullivan about the Bret Hart incident, asking if it were real or fake. Nicole remarked that he was there and insulted him. If this is the way it happened, perhaps it should be mentioned. (I do not remember the episode, it may of been in a different season) ~Tydamann

Fair use rationale for Image:MadtvCast4.jpg

Image:MadtvCast4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider rewriting this section with a NPOV, not a fan's POV

"Nicole Sullivan did not appear in the first five episodes of the fourth season. To this day the reason is still unknown, although it probably is because of a possible sitcom deal Nicole had in the works that wound up falling through. Fans feared that Nicole had left the show for good. However, for the sixth episode of the fourth season (the show's classic Halloween special), Nicole's first episode back on the show, the show had Nicole's popular characters Antonia and The Vancome Lady make appearances to ensure that Nicole was sticking with the show."

Unless you cite references, speculation about Nicole Sullivan's sitcom is just that--guesswork. In fact, saying "to this day the reason is still unknown" why Nicole Sullivan did not appear in the first five episodes is tantamount to saying "I didn't bother to look it up."

From the same section:

"Original female players Nicole Sullivan and Debra Wilson introduced new characters: Latina bimbos Lida and Melina, while Wilson introduced Bunifa, a stereotypical portrayal of African-American women."

Indelicately calling Lida and Melina "Latina bimbos" and gingerly describing Bunifa as "a stereotypical portrayal of African-American women" doesn't work. Given Madtv's vulgar and politically incorrect humor, it's fine to describe Lida and Melina as "Latina bimbos" as long as Bunifa's character is also described as "banjee girl", "ghetto fabulous girl", or something similar.

I appreciate the hours everyone's spent chronicling Madtv's thirteen seasons. And let's face it, it's something only a fan would do. But try to remain a little more detached when describing seasons and actors to downplay the fan factor. Thanks. Kinkyturnip (talk) 07:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode #422

Spishak didn't claim that one out of tem people loved their detergent, they claimed 9 out of 10, but went to the house of the one guy who didn't like it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.173.61.247 (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mad TV (season 4). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060305061102/http://www.madtv.com/ to http://www.madtv.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]