Jump to content

Talk:MLS Cup 2001

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:MLS Cup 2001.gif

[edit]

Image:MLS Cup 2001.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MLS Cup 2001. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resources

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:MLS Cup 2001/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


  • Infobox "After golden goal extra time" is a sea of blue, perhaps you could add "in" between "golden goal" and "extra time"?
    • Fixed.
  • Infobox "Partly Cloudy" no need for capital C.
    • Fixed.
  • "defeating their rivals" you could move "their rivals" to the previous sentence as it seems a little odd to introduce the concept on the second instance where both teams are mentioned together.
    • Fixed.
  • The lead feels a little light. You have a large prose section on the "road to the final" yet none of that appears to be covered in the lead at all (which should, after all, summarise the salient points of all of the article).
    • Added a summary of their playoff runs.
  • " including a lower capacity of " forgive my ignorance, what does "a lower capacity" mean here? Is it as opposed to when people can stand on the pitch at concerts? What would the "higher" or "maximum" capacity be in that case?
    • Rearranged to emphasize that it had a lower capacity compared to other MLS venues of the time (and influenced later SSSes).
  • "Similar soccer-specific stadiums began construction..." I'm not sure how this is even tangentially related to the MLS Cup 2001?
    • Crew Stadium inspired their design and I think it was relevant (especially in the case of the Galaxy's, which went on to host the cup in 2003 and 2004).
  • Check image captions, complete sentences need a period.
  • "division two times" twice?
    • Fixed.
  • " lost the final in 1996 and 1999" don't like the Easter eggy years, could rephrase as "lost in the 1996 and 1999 finals"?
    • Done, though I'd rather leave finals out of the second link to make it look consistent.
  • "went through four coaching changes." during the regular season?
    • Added number of seasons
  • (You could add that Frank Yallop was an Ipswich Town superhero.... maybe not...)
    • Sometimes I forget that Yallop had played for so long overseas.

More ASAP. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 08:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • " a sudden death extra time" another sea of blue here.
    • Removed the second link.
  • " the winning golden goal for" no need for "winning", a golden goal by default is "winning".
    • Removed.
  • " chance to win a treble" probably needs rephrasing as it could be assumed that a treble means winning three MLS cups in a row. This, I assume, means a domestic treble?
    • It was actually a chance to win a continental treble, since the 2000 CONCACAF Championship was played in January 2001, and the U.S. Open Cup was right after the MLS Cup.
      • It would be very useful to include this detail, I've been a football fan all my life but don't know what comprises the American continental treble. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 17:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "color analysis" I have no idea what this means.
    • Added a link to the term. It's an American English thing.
  • Are there any broadcasting figures that could be included here?
    • Added a Nielsen figure, but an actual number is harder to find.
  • "A group of Chicago Fire supporters, estimated at 100 spectators" -> "A group of around 100 Chicago Fire supporters..."
    • Fixed.
  • "l at MLS Cup 2000.[77][75]" numerical order for sources.
    • Fixed.
  • " to outshoot Los Angeles 12–3" are these "shots on target" or just shots in general?
    • Just shots in general, as far I can tell from the SI source.
  • " the winning golden goal " again, golden goals are always "winning".
    • I think it's fine to emphasize that the golden goal was a winning goal here, as those who are unfamiliar with the concept might be confused.
  • "Isaias Bardales" he's actually Jr. right?
    • Fixed.
  • "with golden goals" not plural.
    • Fixed.
  • " being substituted in the 85th minute" I would add "on" before "in" as (certainly in BritEng) it currently reads that he was substituted from the field of play in the 85th minute.
    • Replaced with "entering the match". "Substituted on" isn't quite natural to American English, but that goes for a lot of soccer terms that are in a vague middle ground.
  • " in 2006 and 2007", "in 2011 and 2012", easter eggs again, as I noted before you could make that "in the 2006 and 2007 seasons"... etc.
    • Removed the years entirely from that sentence.

That's all I have on a first pass, so I'll put it on hold for now. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 09:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for picking this up for review. I have addressed everything you have laid out above. SounderBruce 18:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Couple of responses, almost there. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 17:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: I added a short sentence about the treble and changed the captions as needed. SounderBruce 20:37, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Towards the end, I'm still seeing a few Easter egg links, e.g. " in 2003 against " where 2003 isn't the year, it's a link to a specific final, this is where I'd rephrase it something like "in the 2003 tournament against" or similar and pipe "2003 tournament" so it's not a surprise to our readers. Same again in the "...against the Dynamo in 2011 and 2012. " sentence. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 19:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Done and done. I don't necessarily think that linking to other finals would be a total surprise to readers given the context in the article and the section itself, but I'll trust your judgement here. SounderBruce 22:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looking great, so happy to pass this nomination. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MLS_Cup_2001&oldid=1209113365"