Talk:MET Group

Question about MET Group article

Hello DoubleGrazing, I would like to improve the article. Your message states that the article may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Is there anything in particular that you think might need improving? I spent three months composing the edit, and I carefully read the Wikipedia pages that describe how to write good articles. Frankly, I'm convinced that this article is fairly neutral, and that it complies with all content policies. But is there anything that I have overlooked? Kind regards, --Balazspocs METGroup (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Balazspocs METGroup: the wording in that tag is generic to all paid-contributions tags, stating in a non-specific way that the article may contain positive 'spin', because it was written by and for someone with a direct financial interest in the subject, and for that reason readers may want to take things with a proverbial pinch of salt. This would also cover speculative statements, eg. expressions such as "the company aims to" and "is said to be", which don't really belong in an encyclopaedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DoubleGrazing, I would like to improve the article. Your message states that the article may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Is there anything in particular that you think still might need improving? Kind regards, --Balazspocs METGroup (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]