Talk:Luigi Arialdo Radicati di Brozolo

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 July 2021 by reviewer DoubleGrazing (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Autobiography suspect

Dear @CommanderWaterford:, I noticed that you (probably automatically) sent me a message saying that this page is an autobiography. This is actually not the case, in fact my objective was only to translate an already existing page on the Italian wikipedia (not created by me, although I improved it a little bit). The subject is an important Italian physicist, who in any case is now dead, so this fact eliminates completely the doubt on this being an autobiography.

Thanks LuigiRadicati (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LuigiRadicati - This has not been done automatically. Your username clearly implies a very close connection to the subject. Please make yourself comfortable with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response @CommanderWaterford. I created this username because I'm interested in the subject, but I'm not him, nor related to him. I hope I did not violate any rule. If so I did not intend to. Anyway this is just a translation, not new content. I thought it could be useful to have this page in english since professor Radicati spent a considerable part of his career in UK and America, so it might be interesting for english speakers. The purpose of this page is just describing the career of a scientist, who has been relevant in his field and all the info are well confirmed from many sources. I have no interest on this content and I'm not representing the interest of professor Radicati (who is dead and his work is well consolidated in the past) LuigiRadicati (talk) 20:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the COI tag based on your assurances and WP:AGF, and I hope I won't be proven wrong in doing so, but I can certainly see why it was placed. If you're not the person, or related to them, then why pick that name? Any number of possible usernames that aren't confusing... --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I've accepted this at AfC based on presumed notability, judging by the various chairs, awards, etc., but TBH the article could do with more support in that area, hence I've tagged it with refimprove. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]