Talk:Love lock
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Love lock article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | A fact from Love lock appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
Is there any sources date back to the early to mid 1900s
[edit]The article states "The history of love padlocks dates back at least 100 years to a melancholic Serbian tale of World War I, with an attribution for the bridge Most Ljubavi (lit. the Bridge of Love) in the spa town of Vrnjačka Banja." If this is true there should sources way before 1999. Like the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s. 1960s, and so on. ~~ Bayoustarwatch (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Source
[edit]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/opinion/sunday/the-locks-on-pariss-bridges-represent-a-misunderstanding.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.15.137 (talk) 02:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Proposed move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move to Love lock. -- tariqabjotu 02:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
– Of the five Google Alerts news stories in my inbox, only one ([1]) mentions both "love padlocks" and "love locks"; the rest ([2] [3] [4] [5]) only mention the latter. Also wondering if the title of this article should be singular per WP:PLURAL. I should note that "love lock", but not "love locks", redirects to Lovelock (disambiguation). --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 06:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 03:41, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Agree - I guess the source of the current name should be found in the first version of the article (perhaps a direct translation of the Hungarian word for the phenomena?). Love locks seems to be more widely used. --Heb (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)- Support; seems reasonable to me. bobrayner (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- oppose They're padlocks. The original Love padlocks is clear and straightforward. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support List of locations with love locks and support Love lock. Per nom, but singular for the main article. Red Slash 03:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
It seems the 100 year history is fictional
[edit]I have looked at every citation and mention of the phenomena and they all lead back to descriptions of the poem in this article http://www.vrnjackabanja.co.rs/srpski/mostpocmeni which does not seem to mention the heartbroken schoolteacher, the bridge, or even locks.
Is this really a published work by Desanka Maksimovic? Can we get someone to translate properly? I think we have a case of circular reference here. 47.18.34.63 (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Beyond the scope
[edit]Love locks can also refer to locks of hair given as a cherished gift to loved ones. It is an old custom but around the turn of the 20th century some women used to cut a piece of their hair to give to their lovers. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Love lock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905142909/http://www2.canada.com/westerly/news/story.html?id=dfbfc1bc-6501-4258-9854-ad2afe035e68 to http://www2.canada.com/westerly/news/story.html?id=dfbfc1bc-6501-4258-9854-ad2afe035e68
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)