Talk:List of retired Pacific typhoon names

List of retired Pacific typhoon names is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 19, 2008	Featured list candidate	Promoted
December 28, 2014	Featured list removal candidate	Kept

Current status: Featured list

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific High‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as High-importance).

Colors

I know it's standard, but only because I checked. Somewhere there should be mention of why the typhoon names have certain colors when they are listed. —Scouter Sig 21:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move page

I think it's about time that this page be moved to incorporate all retired Pacific typhoon names. Rather than splitting articles up by agency, it's probably best to combine them all into a single article. Since this is a featured list, I figured I would have to discuss this before doing anything. Details for the PAGASA names are readily available within its respective article and I have the table for JTWC names prepared in a sandbox. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure its wise to be including the PAGASA names within this article, but im fine for the JTWC one to be included. Would suggest contacting TRM and posibily a few of the other FLC Editors.Jason Rees (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs to be reworked regardless since it doesn't meet FLC standards anymore as far as I can tell. As for PAGASA, I don't see an issue with including them. What I have in my mind is the following format:

==List of retired names==
===JTWC era names===
===JMA era names===
===PAGASA names===

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's basically ready to be moved. User:Jason Rees recently updated and added the pre-2000 retirees. I'm moving it, although if anyone has any problems or concerns as a result of the move, please comment that here. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Future G/FT

Get every retired storm rated good article or better: 58% complete

List of retired Pacific typhoon names

50 articles

@Yellow Evan: thank you for your work on Typhoon Ike! We are one article closer to having every retired Pacific typhoons rated as a good article or better. With Yellow Evan's recent work on Typhoon Mike, every single retired named used by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center is a good article, so arguably we could have a good topic for JTWC names. Not sure how we would name it, or if it would violate the spirit of good topics. Jason Rees might have a say. The Wikiwork for all retired Pacific typhoon names is 2.60, which is between B-class and GA-class. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Since the JMA and the typhoon committee have basically adopted the JTWC names, I think it would have to be one topic im afraid.Jason Rees (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've assumed this would be one topic for like six years :P Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then are there any newer editors who might be interested in working on typhoons from this decade? There are a lot of newer storms that aren't in too good of shape. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, there's a good chance by this time next year I'll be doing mid 90s WPAC articles but I doubt it'll touch anything post 2006 where most of these goles lie. I'd like to see someone like Typhoon2013 give some of these a shot but I don't know if he'd be up for it. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:37, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Meow:, and anyone else watching this page - are there any editors on the 2018 Pacific typhoon season who could provide editing skills for this set of typhoon articles? I know there's a typhoon threatening Japan (Jongdari) but there are some pretty important storms that have scant (or unreliable) information on Wikipedia, especially after 2006. If anyone has some editing time, I think it's fair to say this is a priority. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IT HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED

13.1 Replacement of Typhoon Names - Feb14.pdf (typhooncommittee.org). Expect these names to be retired. SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and Noru and Nalgae that was an old link SarikaHaimaParmaMolaveWelpring (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]