Talk:List of philosophy journals
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]If someone has the time, why not check the list at the following URL, and import the information? http://www.philinfo.org/journals.htm
Undergraduate journals
[edit]Are they really notable? Do they have ISBN numbers? (That's required of books, it would seem prudent to make the same requirement of journals.) Are they "available at a dozen or more libraries and be catalogued by its country of origin's official or de facto national library"? (Also required of books, but I doubt all undergraduate journals meet this requirement.) Or do they fall under self-publication? (I'm sure at least some of them do.) --D. Webb 17:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think they do. Do you know of one in particular that doesn't? I'd still consider them notable if they're read by people, and available in libraries, which I suspect they are, even if they have no ISBN. Llamabr 10:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]Does a journal have to have a Wikipedia page in order to be listed here? If not then http://www.businessethicsjournalreview.com should be added. (It has an ISSN, and is listed in the Philosophers Index.
- (New topics should go below.) No it doesn't have to, although this is strongly recommended.
While you are at this, why wouldn't you add a WP:STUB about the journal? Upon cursory glance it looks WP:NOTABLE.kashmiri TALK 14:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)- Article creation seems to be premature. I don't see any evidence that this journal passes WP:NJournals or WP:GNG (not too surprising for a journal that's barely in its second volume), so I would caution against creating an article for it right now. --Randykitty (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- You are right, Randykitty. Retracting my previous recommendation to the journal as it fails notability criterion. kashmiri TALK 23:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Article creation seems to be premature. I don't see any evidence that this journal passes WP:NJournals or WP:GNG (not too surprising for a journal that's barely in its second volume), so I would caution against creating an article for it right now. --Randykitty (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)