Talk:List of people with color blindness

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Genetics / Ophthalmology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Molecular Biology: Genetics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Color Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Color, a project that provides a central approach to color-related subjects on Wikipedia. Help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards; visit the wikiproject page for more details.ColorWikipedia:WikiProject ColorTemplate:WikiProject Colorcolor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

List of people with color blindness is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 29 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of people with color blindness → List of colorblind people – "Colorblind people" seems to both be more commonly used and considered more grammatically correct than "people with color blindness". The latter is also the more popular search term on Google Trends. ⓋᎯ☧ǿᖇǥ@ℤε 💬 11:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree because it is not "more commonly used" as a category title on Wikipedia. In fact, almost every disability is categorized using "with", except for "blind people" and "deaf people" because naturally it would be awkward to categorize those using "with" and thus they should be the only rationally justifiable exceptions. Let's not go messing with long-established category formats. --Nicholas0 (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Nicholas0:When I said "more commonly used", I didn't mean on Wikipedia, I meant in real life. Other than that, I see what you mean.--ⓋᎯ☧ǿᖇǥ@ℤε 💬 19:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support more concise and idiomatic English. b uidhe 22:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I prefer the current formulation, as it simply describes the fact that the person has the condition, whereas "colorblind person" makes it sound like something that defines them. I have color blindness myself but other than the fact that I probably can't be an airline pilot, it doesn't affect my life at all and I rarely think about it. — Amakuru (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per @Nicholas0's point. Sleath56 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Pictures

Instead of only including a few pictures on the side, would it be better to include pictures (where available) for all people named in the table? Ggdivhjkjl (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]