Talk:List of column-oriented DBMSes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled discussion

At least some of these databases do not seem to be column oriented.

For example: IBM DB2 Microsoft SQL Server

Corrections needed

They have column-oriented tables. However, SQL Server only form 2014 onwards (the 2012 version is very meagre). --176.94.100.174 (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What about Cassandra and HBase? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.62.153 (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See https://blog.pythian.com/why-column-stores/. --176.94.100.174 (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a circular reference as it links back to this article. Yeah, this list needs others listed: Cassandra, HBase is there. Scylla. Amazon DynamoDB. etc. Reference can be made to DB-Engines.com as a list. --Petercorless (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DB-engines.com is not a reliable source but little more than a PR platform for vendors and products. And the methodology of their popularity rankings (instead of a systematic, credible installation count or estimate) is questionable at best. GermanJoe (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What about Azure Data Explorer? I wanted to add it, but the full Article I'm writing about Azure Data Explorer is still pending review. Should I add it as a red-link? regular text? Guregini (talk) 17:09, 08 Dec 2019 (UTC)

Proprietary - Sadas Engine

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Information to be added or removed: SADAS ENGINE
Explanation of issue: Sadas Engine is a column - oriented DBMSes designed for business intelligence, analytics, big data, CRM, DWH applications. It is used by important Client of the Banking sector (such as 130Servicing, Bank of Sondrio, Raiffeisen Bank International ), for this reason, could be included in the "Proprietary" list of this article.
References supporting change: http://centotrenta.com/it/centotrenta-servicing-migliora-lefficienza-dei-propri-processi-di-business-grazie-alla-tecnologia-sadas-engine/ https://www.raiffeisenverband.it/it/i-nostri-servizi/information-technology/banche/reparto-operativo.html https://www.qlik.com/it-it/-/media/files/customer-success/it/banco-popolare-customer-success-story-it.pdf https://www.assilea.it/repository/doc/lettereassilea/1_2017.pdf#page=54

Thank you }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 09:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, it doesn't have a Wikipedia article yet. Note also that the sources you point to don't demonstrate notability in the way Wikipedia is looking for, which is significant independent coverage. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See the draft at User:Giuseppe Ardolino/sandbox, but IMO that does not yet demonstrate notability either. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thjarkur, Thank you for your feedback. What do you mean with "Note also that the sources you point to don't demonstrate notability ", they are external articles that support Sadas Engine as a column-oriented DBMS. Sorry for the questions, I trying to understand how to publish these details to increase the Wikipedia information. }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your product does exist, but it doesn't appear that it's notable enough for a Wikipedia article yet (which is a prerequisite for being added to this list). – Thjarkur (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]