Jump to content

Talk:List of allied military operations of the Vietnam War (1966)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of allied military operations of the Vietnam War (1966)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 14:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Shed Light added. 18th Infantry Regiment (United States) - reference is to WWII events, not Vietnam. 28th Infantry Regiment (United States) - unable to determine if these were part of active operations and source is broken. Mztourist (talk) 02:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please correct Operation Dodge [not Operation Dodge City]. It is listed as starting on July 17. The USS Fiske DD 842 provided NGFS for Operation Dodge and the deck logs indicate this operation began on June 17, 1966. I would gladly provide a copy of said deck log entry on request. I have certified copies from NARA. Please feel free to contact me at wgd@vetsnet.us. [User: William G. Davis] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff4 (talkcontribs) 01:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have found a ref in Shulimson (p. 149) stating Operation Dodge was from 17-23 June and have corrected accordingly. Mztourist (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Operation Lincoln links to something entirely different; I'm unsure how to correct. Crowish (talk) 04:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of allied military operations of the Vietnam War (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-2018

[edit]

Mztourist, A bicyclette, I have removed the references and claimed casualty numbers for Amarillo and Byrd because the webrefs now link to single advert pages. I have not removed all the links to Ref 2, but that also is a advert page now and will need to be fixed.

I have also reverted Mztourist's removal of "U.S. claim" in the casualty header at the top of the page. This is entirely accurate ; there are no claims on this page sourced from PAVN/Northern sources, and it provides needed context in view of the unreliability of many body counts. I'm sick of such accurate descriptions being removed for insufficient reasons; Mztourist, should you remove such an accurate description again - when all such sources are indeed U.S., rather than Northern/VC - you will be sanctioned. Regards to all, Buckshot06 (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you should be well aware, I have raised this whole issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#RfC regarding US claims of North Vietnamese and Vietcong casualties on Vietnam War battle pages and you should await the outcome of that RFC and ensure that A bicyclette stops making these changes until that RFC is finalized rather than threatening me with sanctions.Mztourist (talk) 10:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In view of the fact that the clarification is useful and obvious, given that there are no Northern/PAVN etc sources listed, that U.S. claims were often unreliable, and that other editors at the RfC have endorsed the reasonable nature of annotating U.S. claims as U.S. when there are no other sources, I have elected to block you for three days. Buckshot06 (talk) 10:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]