Talk:List of airliners by maximum takeoff weight

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Airbus A330neo#-900|Airbus A330-900]] Anchor Airbus A330neo#-900 links to a specific web page: Airbus A330-800. The anchor (#-900) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Wide-body aircraft#Widebody specifications|Wide-body aircraft]] The anchor (#Widebody specifications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

COMAC ARJ21

The COMAC ARJ21 is a Chinese regional jet airliner that is currently undergoing flight testing. I just wanted to make sure it would be appropriate to add it to the list before I edited the page. Shane Stachwick (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unit and consistency

MTOW is given in pounds while MLW is given in metric tonne. May be we should have values in both unit. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MTOW has been changed from pounds to kg, but MLW is still in metric tonnes (incorrectly spelled tons). Unless anyone objects, I will convert MLW to kg. Comfr (talk) 18:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

757

Isn´t the Boeing 757 considered "Heavy" (ICAO) due to her excessive wake vortex (despite being lighter than 300.000 lb)? 46.114.47.45 (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of airliners by maximum takeoff weight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106081142/http://www.agustawestland.com/product/aw101-1 to http://www.agustawestland.com/product/aw101-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of airliners by maximum takeoff weight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never built

I removed the two "never built" Airbus entries from the table. Is there a reason to have them in the table? If they were never built then they never existed, and their maximum takeoff weight is imaginary! Perhaps there is some subtlety that I am missing, but if so a note needs to be added to their table entries to explain why they are in the table. Nick Beeson (talk) 23:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cargo capacity

Interesting article, thanks! I'd have thought (but I am certainly not an aviation expert) that another interesting stat would be the maximum cargo capacity, which is presumably the maximum landing weight minus the empty weight. So it would be nice to have either the empty weight or the maximum cargo capacity (or both) in the table. --Macrakis (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tonnes

Why is MTOW given in kg and MLK in tonnes (presumably metric tonnes = megagrams)? As suggested by @Comfr: two years ago, they should be consistent. I think I prefer tonnes to kg, rounded to the nearest tonne, except for those under 10 tonnes (so 151, 49, and 9.7 tonnes). After all, it's not as though anyone is going to be using these figures for critical operations, so more precision than that is pedantic and superfluous... especially since a lot of the numbers already look like they're rounded to the nearest thousand or hundred kg. --Macrakis (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]