Talk:Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris
Appearance
A fact from Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris has been misattributed to Cicero, Cato, Pomponius Laetus and a mysterious Modestus? Source: Paniagua, op. cit., para. 14: "...l’opuscolo anonimo pseudo-ciceroniano, pseudocatoniano e pseudo-modestino..." For Laetus, see article.
- ALT1: ... that the Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris was printed at least six times before 1500? Source: Reeve, op. cit., p. 423: "the one incunable that [the editors] use", but "they ignore as many as five incunables" and he lists them.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alonzo Church
Created by Srnec (talk). Self-nominated at 02:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |