Talk:Leroy & Stitch

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Disney Television Animation#Television films|Walt Disney Television Animation]] The anchor (#Television films) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 18:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wierd Plot...

I mean, they make it sound like the only reason Jumba, Pleakley and Stitch satyed on Earth was to catch all the experiments. And that makes no sence, they were staying before anybody but Jumba knew about the other experements.

Besides, if the plot is true, there is no way the movie can come out this year. They've hardly gotten all the experements! Besides, Gantu's got a few usless once that should be rescued anyway!

But even if the plot was true, they've got to stay 15-20 more years for Bonnie and Clyde.

They were parrolled! Aa623 15:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)aa623[reply]

Well, it's obvious the show won't go on forever, and Bonnie and Clyde's true place must've been the jail. What I'm curious to see is how they get "Reuben" as 625's name. 66.57.20.114 21:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude! They never said they would stay until they caught every experiment, they were AWARDED and the awards had stuff to do with leaving!!! It's VERY obvious.

Rumor squashing

From an e-mail from Jess Winfield to a L&S fan who posted it on her deviantART journal here, some things have been confirmed, others killed.

For instance, Jess confirms that "Angel appears in the movie, as do all the experiments," but "she does not have a large role." By all the experiments, I would say that means all the ones that have appeared in the series.

Now comes the fun part: The killing of the rampant rumors.

About Stitch and Angel getting married: "She's certainly not marrying Stitch;".

About Stitch's personality changing: "and of course we would never change Stitch's personality."

And the big one: Is Leroy Experiment 627? "And no, Leroy is NOT experiment 627! Buena Vista Home Entertainment, who is distributing the movie, put that in their press release after we told them several times it was incorrect; they even decided to release the movie on "6/27" even after we told them of their error. As you'll see, there's actually a scene in the movie where our characters specifically point out that they CAN'T call Leroy "627."

He also covered a couple things pertaining to Angel and her episode, which I won't bother going into here, as those don't deal specifically with the movie.

Small Detail

This is just something small I noticed while watching the movie: "brb" is internet chat abbreviation for "be right back," so the BRB in the movie (big red battleship, which was introduced in the beginning when Stitch left Earth) could foreshadow the ending, that Stitch will not truly go to live in space, but instead will "be right back" (return to Earth and live with Lilo again). Did anyone else see it this way, or am I just stretching it? ^_^ However, even so, it isn't that significant, as I believe they mentioned in previews for the movie that Lilo and Stitch would need to reunite to defeat Leroy. Also, the paragraph about Leroy's number could use some cleanup... Toadette Fan 22:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm split on this. On the one hand, Disney today isn't smart enough to intentionally foreshadow. On the other hand, AOL acronyms may inherently outweigh that rule. :) 66.109.47.233 02:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the brb thing, I just never could see the signifigance. User:zmanm407

BRB, as the OP said is internet for Be Right Back, and 9000 is part of an internet meme "It's over 9000 (!!!)", and as 9000 is not over 9000, one could interpret the ship's name as "Be right back, it's not over" 172.143.167.48 (talk) 10:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Over 9000!" wasn't popular until 2007 at best. 71.60.161.100 (talk) 23:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

neopet assistant

who deleted my remark!?

Ok, if no one is going to tell me, its vandalism.

Plot

This plot synopsis seems to be too elaborative for me. The edit marker for the text is so crammed, its displaying very oddly. Anyone who could make the section more concise and managable, please help. -Randall Brackett 01:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The plot synopsis for the bonus episode is especially bad - overlong, badly written, and full of inappropriate ampersands. 68.255.60.58 04:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm planning to attempt a clean up of the article to make it shorter and more concise. Should there even be a detailed synopsis of the included episode? I think a brief summary would suffice as this article is about Leroy and Stitch and not about the entire series. --Growly 11:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs

I had to correct the goofs section - it listed the Grand Councilwoman having two legs as a goof - stating that she had three in Stitch! The Movie and Lilo and Stitch. This is incorrect, as the official model sheets clearly display her with two legs. --Growly 11:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leroy's Number

Uh. Someone's being pretty intense over here. This section seems a bit crufty and a lot original researchy. Last I checked, there's no official word from Disney or BV about Leroy's number. So all the bold stuff and all caps stuff can probably be taken out without lowering the tone of the article. 207.172.129.153 19:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a bunch-a HOOPLA! (Kashira~)

WTF? Leroy and Stitch 2?! First a lilo and stitch article said something about Lilo and Stitch 3D: The Return of 627 now Leroy and stitch 2?

Is there any official word on a Lilo and Stitch 5: The Movie? If there is then SAY SO HERE! I'm getting tired of this...Leroy and Stitch 2? This movie finished off the series! If the plot of this Lilo and Stitch 5 is what the title is then it might just serve as an after-story!

I can think of a good plot for it: Leroy returns and steals the experiments and shifts them off to a planet where he plans to turn them evil and Lilo and Stitch must defeat him one last time and save their O~Hana~!

but that is HIGLY unlikely

Sure I would love to see a Lilo and Stitch 5 and 6 but I think that might be Highly UNLIKELY!

Unless if they're going to release a Lilo and Stitch Adventures in Kawaii Series!

but again, HIGHLY UNLIKELY! Email or send Disney a letter and ask them if there might be a Lilo and Stitch 5 or a Lilo and Stitch adventure series!

Sir aaron sama girl 02:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second movie?

Unless there's a source, I'll have to remove it. Dylan Damien 12:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Stenchy?

How come he is seen in the film when in his episode he is sent to Pleakley's home planet? Dylan Damien 12:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With kid shows almost nothing is Canon. the only shows that are actually Canon are Animes. besides, its a kids show the animators don't acyually care what characters they put in because kids won't care. Sir aaron sama girl 21:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leroy & Stitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714121134/http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/moviemom/2010/03/interview-dean-deblois-and-chr.html to http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/moviemom/2010/03/interview-dean-deblois-and-chr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]