Talk:Leptospermum scoparium

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Tasmania / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Leptospermum scoparium is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of New Zealand#Polynesian foundation|arrival of the Polynesian people]] The anchor (#Polynesian foundation) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Can't its honey cure MRSA?

See this article- http://www.accessscience.com/content.aspx?id=SN13350&searchStr=MRSA#searchTerm

DarkestMoonlight (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insertion of empty sections

I have taken the liberty of removing the empty section on toxicology. Whoever put it there left no indication of whether there exists any information on the subject. If in fact there is no information (if for example the plant turns out to not be toxic), this would send potential contributors on a wild goose chase. I have no objections to the section being reinstated, provided that whoever does it actually provide some content at the same time.

In general, putting in empty sections amounts to a request for other people to answer questions that you have thought of. Why not answer the question yourself? If you have a reason to put the section in, you must already have some ideas (and hence some research leads) as to what should go under it.

In some cases, an empty section may be appropriate. For example, the section on nomenclature and taxonomy is one you might expect in any article on a plant species (so I left that one alone). But a section on toxicology is not appropriate for every plant. For example, would you expect to see such a section in an article on redwoods, or roses, or tumbleweed, or oranges? Neoprote (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leptospermum scoparium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]