Talk:Leo J. Ryan Federal Building
Leo J. Ryan Federal Building was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review note
[edit]Review: this article is being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).Trishm 11:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC) I have passed this article as it appears to meet the Good Article criteria. Nice job. Further improvements would be polishing the prose to 'sparkling' - adding details and using phrases that allow you to visualise or otherwise become connected to the building. A peer review may be the next step.
Well done! Trishm 12:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I will work on the prose, and then after that is done post for a Peer Review. Smee 12:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC).
- Good job Smee! Anonymous Dissident Utter 02:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Smee 02:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC).
- Good job Smee! Anonymous Dissident Utter 02:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Delilsted
[edit]Sorry guys - I've reviewed this at WP:ARCHPR I'm delisting on the grounds it's not broad enough in it's coverage of the building itself (3a). --Mcginnly | Natter 09:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- That is most unfortunate. (2) other editors took a look at this article and both thought it was GA material. Both the GA reviewer and the other editor that commented at the Peer Review. Please reconsider. Smee 19:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC).
- I agree with Mcginnly, it is a decent article, but it simply doesn't have sufficient coverage of the building. Perhaps some more information as was suggested in the Peer Review would be beneficial. Lsi john 21:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leo J. Ryan Federal Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20060514011937/http://www.intres.com/portfolio/projects/1993_030_25.aspx to http://www.intres.com/portfolio/projects/1993_030_25.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- B-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles