Talk:Lenox Library (New York City)

Lenox Library (New York City) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 5, 2018. (Reviewed version).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lenox Library (New York City)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk · contribs) 11:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the "Early History" chapter, reference no 1 claims: "He bought them and sold them to Mr. Lenox with a ten percent commission." I could not find this "10 percent" figure on pages 13 or 14, as cited in the reference.

added other page Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I could not find the "ten percent commission" quote on page 60, neither.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed page Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference no. 3 does not give an exact page number or range in the book.

Added Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In reference no 4, someone added "full citation needed". A full citation is not necessary, and thus needs to be removed from the source. The same goes for reference no 8.

changedEddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:57, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference no 9 cites a Library Journal that has no online access. I thus cannot verify its claim. Is there any url link that can be added?--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Reference 9, a link already exists. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It exists, all right, but I cannot verify any of the specific content that the article claims, because the link offers no search option. Do you have that journal at your disposal? Is there no other (online) source available for these claims?--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's google books. If you click "search in this book", and then type what you want to search, it'll search within the book. The URL is (as listed on the page) https://books.google.com/books?id=8j8DAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA200. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3E1I5S8B9RF7 I believe I have responded to all of your issues. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

I think the article meets the GA criteria. The issues have been resolved.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]