Talk:Latitudinarianism (philosophy)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've read this article thrice ...
[edit]... and have still no idea what Latitudinarianism is. Someone please explain it to the daft layman that I am. Use an example if necessary. Thanks. Maikel 22:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
It couldn't be simpler. Boleslaw (talk) 07:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The word itself seems extremely long and pseudo intellectual rather then constructive and informitive. I wonder if this philosophy is not philosophy at all and the article should be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WitsBlomstein (talk • contribs) 02:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class epistemology articles
- Low-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of language articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Stub-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Stub-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles