Talk:Language and thought

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics / Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Mind / Language Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind
	Philosophy of language

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Suggestions for future edits

The debate about whether or not thought is possible without language (whether language evolved for thought) should eventually be added and probably as its own section or withing LOTH theories. Pinker and the idea of mentalese should be better developed. Additionally, I feel that the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis should ultimately be its own section and the "studies" should be incorporated within the section. The "Other schools of thought" section should be better developed--other schools of thought as opposed to ?? linguistics? philosophy? Honestly, someone should really consider a new outline for this article--but that should be a group effort so I didn't change it myself. BlandK (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

what is the difference between linguis relativ and linguistic determ

They are not necessarily different. Linguistic relativity is the idea that one's language affects the way they view the world. This is divided into a strong and weak view. Linguistic determinism is the strong version of the hypothesis--idea that one's language limits one's thoughts and thought processes such as categorization and memory. Did that help?? BlandK (talk) 01:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Vygotsky?

From Lev Vygotsky#Thought and language: Another important Vygotskyan contribution concerns the inter-relationship of language development and thought. This concept, explored in Vygotsky's book Thought and Language, establishes the explicit and profound connection between oral language (speech) and the development of mental concepts... Ewlyahoocom 10:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Memes

Memetic theory and/or Memes should be referenced in some way. I can't quite think of a good way to do it right now, so maybe someone else can? 85.178.69.56 17:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actual research?

Has anyone done actual reasearch on why so many people claim to somehow "think in language" and what they mean by it? Say by magnetic imaging? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.121.52.247 (talk) 07:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I think this article is fine in terms of notability - I came here from Google and found all the answers I was looking for, however brief. It's also a topic that gets covered in British college A-level exams, so I think it's worth keeping. Lithium (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph

I'm going to point out that the claim made in the second paragraph, that 'thought comes first, while language is an expression', isn't irrefutable and might well be confusing for someone who's coming to the article looking for a good summary of the philosophical side of the question. 108.15.44.119 (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]