Talk:Lajonkairia lajonkairii

Bivalves Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bivalves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bivalves on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BivalvesWikipedia:WikiProject BivalvesTemplate:WikiProject BivalvesBivalves articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Japan: Flora and fauna Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:37, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Flora and fauna task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

On 4 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ruditapes philippinarum. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

On 4 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ruditapes philippinarum. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Roditapes philipinarum

Voice 120.28.236.231 (talk) 06:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus; a split should be considered instead. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 11:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lajonkairia lajonkairii → Ruditapes philippinarum – These aren't actually synonyms, and almost all the info in the page refers to Ruditapes (the Manila clam). It looks like the page used to be Venerupis philippinarum, which is a synonym of Ruditapes, not Lajonkairia. Seems like it was probably an honest mistake. ^[1]. Zilchlucre (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Zilchlucre (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Japan has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Bivalves has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Worms considers these different species. Would a split not be better? YorkshireExpat (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A split would be very reasonable. Currently all the info in the article appears to be about Ruditapes (but correct me if I'm wrong), so an article on Lajonkairia would probably have to be written from new sources. Zilchlucre (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Ruditapes philippinarum". WoRMS.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 4 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. A split may be in the cards. – robertsky (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lajonkairia lajonkairii → Ruditapes philippinarum – These aren't actually synonyms, and almost all the info in the page refers to Ruditapes (the Manila clam). Zilchlucre (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). ThomasEverest (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please go through with undoing this. It is very confusing. The title is Lajonkairia lajonkairii but all the info is Ruditapes philippinarum.

Oppose. As noted last time, if R. philippinarum is a separate species, then split it out. The solution is not to move this page though, which deals at least as much with L. lajonkairii and is sourced as such. — Amakuru (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK please do that then. Every time I try to edit something, my work is undone with very rude comments about my knowledge and abilities. ThomasEverest (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Splitting Ruditapes and Lajonkairia

Regarding the previous move requests: I would be willing to edit the current R. philippinarum redirect page so that it can become the Manila clam page, but I think that will leave this article a stub. I was unable to find any English-language scientific literature on Lajonkairia on Web of Science or Google Scholar. I don't really know where else to look. Is there any need for a Lajonkairia page? Zilchlucre (talk) 22:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked and someone already fixed the R. philippinarum page. Thanks! Zilchlucre (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the current status on the two pages? It seems there is a lot of conflicting data in the L. lajonkairii page. This is also the first page that comes up when searching for "Manila clam", so it seems like a problem if these are entirely different species. 38.141.200.21 (talk) 09:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Ruditapes philippinarum". WoRMS.

[1]