This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
At the FAC for the article on Poulenc, this exchange came up. I said I'd mention it here, and now do so:
Our article doesn't capitalise the V of "La voix humaine", any reason you do?
I think the capitalisation in our article on La Voix humaine is debatable. Though we'd normally expect a common noun like "voix" to be uncapitalised in a French title, there is no doubt that the composer's practice was to capitalise it (e.g. "Denise et moi redonné La Voix humaine à New York") a practice followed by his biographer Carl Schmidt. Practice varies on the documentation with the available CDs. Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians doesn't capitalise "voix", but from the same publisher The Oxford Dictionary of Music does. On balance I incline to the view that the composer and his principal biographer should be followed. I'll mention the point on the talk page of the opera.
Yes, that makes sense, avoiding anarchy. (Pleasing to reflect that Grove from das Land ohne Musik is our ultimate operatic authority!) As the Poulenc biography I have up for FAC is not part of the opera project I'd really rather like to stick to Poulenc's preferred form there. Do you think that would upset any of the opera project people? I could add an explanatory footnote on the point if wanted. Tim riley talk19:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't dare to correct a Featured Article of yours (unless absent-mindedly). For wider input by the Opera Project people (I'm not), you could raise the matter at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera, or not. BTW, there are still 3 occurrences of La voix in lower case in the Poulenc article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I support following the composer's preferred version, as I did in A Boy was Born. I wouldn't mind changing our guidelines also, to make it easier not to follow the semi-sacred "house style" (which has been made by us, not by some revelation) but the creator, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article should remain as La voix humaine per the guidelines. I have no objection to anyone using La Voix humaine within another article if they so choose - just pipe the link here. (PS: If we're going by Poulenc's wishes, wouldn't the title be The Human Voice? As far as I remember, the composer wanted his operas performed in English to English-speaking audiences. Just a thought. Not that I'm suggesting moving this there!). --Folantin (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to all for these tolerant and helpful comments. Particular thanks to Michael B for spotting the inconsistency in the FAC article. Shall away to correct instanter! Tim riley talk18:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
