Jump to content

Talk:Kiribati at the 2020 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Kiribati at the 2020 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 16:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 22:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time to review! 48JCLTALK 22:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused): Main aspects covered, and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: not sure how you’re supposed to be quote unquote not neutral anyways.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Copyvio

[edit]

Earwig shows 6.5%.

Source spot-check

[edit]

Reviewed refs 1 to 13 along with some others, seems good.

Final comments

[edit]

Good luck on the GT! Addressed some minor style issues and other issues. Good work! Passed. 48JCLTALK 00:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hey man im josh talk 14:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 03:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Universality slot?

[edit]

What is a "universality slot"? The article should explain that. RoySmith (talk) 15:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Done! :) Arconning (talk) 06:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]