Wikipedia:WikiProject Micronesia/Assessment
| Micronesia articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
 FA
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 16 | |
| FL
|
1 | 1 | |||||
| FM
|
2 | 2 | |||||
 A
|
1 | 1 | |||||
 GA
|
2 | 11 | 31 | 13 | 57 | ||
| B | 6 | 8 | 10 | 27 | 32 | 83 | |
| C | 19 | 17 | 45 | 115 | 71 | 267 | |
| Start | 31 | 19 | 134 | 511 | 490 | 1,185 | |
| Stub | 16 | 11 | 77 | 917 | 1,040 | 2,061 | |
| List | 6 | 4 | 11 | 102 | 147 | 270 | |
| Category | 4,206 | 4,206 | |||||
| Disambig | 8 | 8 | |||||
| File | 31 | 31 | |||||
| Portal | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Project | 48 | 48 | |||||
| Redirect | 3 | 3 | 4 | 39 | 185 | 234 | |
| Template | 335 | 335 | |||||
| NA | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Other | 11 | 11 | |||||
| Assessed | 82 | 65 | 293 | 1,752 | 4,830 | 1,798 | 8,820 |
| Unassessed | 9 | 9 | |||||
| Total | 82 | 65 | 293 | 1,752 | 4,830 | 1,807 | 8,829 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 19,724 | Ω = 5.37 | |||||
Welcome to the assessment department of the Micronesia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the Micronesia, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Micronesia}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Micronesia articles by quality and Category:Micronesia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Micronesia WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
[edit]An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Micronesia}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Micronesia
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
}}
Quality assessment
[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Micronesia}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Micronesia articles) | FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Micronesia articles) | A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Micronesia articles) | GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Micronesia articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Micronesia articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Micronesia articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Micronesia articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Micronesia articles) | FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Micronesia articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale
[edit]- Project home - WikiProject Micronesia
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Micronesia}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
| FL |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
| A |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
| GA |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
| B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
| C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
| Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
| List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Micronesia articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Importance assessment
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Micronesia}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Micronesia|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
| Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Micronesia articles) | Top | |
| High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Micronesia articles) | High | |
| Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Micronesia articles) | Mid | |
| Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Micronesia articles) | Low | |
| NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Micronesia articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Micronesia articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
[edit]- Project home - WikiProject Micronesia
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Micronesia}}.
Information on Importance Scheme
| Importance | Criteria | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Kindergarten |
| High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Factory Acts |
| Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | 0.999... |
| Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | G cell |
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- Yap Last assessed in 2007. Currently rated Start class. Article has been greatly expanded since then. Requesting reassessment. PaintedCarpet (talk) 18:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Religion in the Marshall Islands Currently rated Stub class. Article has been greatly expanded since then. Requesting reassessment. User:I'ma editor2022 (talk) 18:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Assessment log
[edit]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
November 10, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- James Moylan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Nauru-Philippines relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
November 9, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Japanese occupation of German colonial possessions (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Category:Wikipedia requested images of Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of roads in Guam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of roads in the Northern Mariana Islands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 8, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Joint Region Marianas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
November 7, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- LGBT rights in Kiribati renamed to LGBTQ rights in Kiribati.
- LGBT rights in Nauru renamed to LGBTQ rights in Nauru.
- LGBT rights in Palau renamed to LGBTQ rights in Palau.
- LGBT rights in the Federated States of Micronesia renamed to LGBTQ rights in the Federated States of Micronesia.
- LGBT rights in the Marshall Islands renamed to LGBTQ rights in the Marshall Islands.
- LGBT rights in the Northern Mariana Islands renamed to LGBTQ rights in the Northern Mariana Islands.
Reassessed
[edit]- Aaadonta (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Federated States of Micronesia-South Korea relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- LGBTQ rights in Kiribati (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in Nauru (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in Palau (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in the Federated States of Micronesia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in the Marshall Islands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- LGBTQ rights in the Northern Mariana Islands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
November 6, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- 2020 in Guam (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
- 2021 in Guam (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 2000 Guam Republican presidential caucuses (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- 2000 Guam presidential caucuses (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Guam Democratic caucuses (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Kimberlyn King-Hinds (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
November 5, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Template:Years in Nauru (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 4, 2024
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- Rose Nakanaga (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Worklist
[edit]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.