Talk:Kevin Lippert
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 05:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
No edits in twelve days following promise of further expansion (and cleanup) the following day; closing as unsuccessful
( )
- ... that Kevin Lippert started Princeton Architectural Press by selling books out of the trunk of his car? Source: “Mr. Lippert printed 1,000 copies and hawked them to students for $55 apiece out of the trunk of his car. They sold out immediately.Thus was born Princeton Architectural Press, of which he was founder and publisher. It eventually branched out beyond its classic reprint series to produce high-quality books on architecture, design and visual culture — and, later, books on hobbies and crafts, children’s books and note cards.” NY Times
Moved to mainspace by Thriley (talk). Self-nominated at 16:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kevin Lippert; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- @Thriley: nice work. Everything checks out, just waiting for that QPQ. ~ Prodraxis (Merry Christmas!) 14:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Thriley: Please provide a QPQ or this nomination will be marked for rejection and closed. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
@Prodraxis: Thank you for your review. I have just added a QPQ. Thriley (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I accept the hook, in that case. Prodraxis (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- I pulled this for extensive copyright violations. After pulling it, I went back and took a closer look and ended up tagging it for WP:G12. I don't understand how this got through two reviews. RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am going to try to salvage this if possible. I’ll expand out more tomorrow. Thriley (talk) 04:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)