Talk:Kenneth Button (economist)
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 1 July 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Kenneth Button (economist). (non-admin closure) {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 10:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Kenneth Button → Kenneth Button (transport researcher) – No clear primary topic between this person and Kenneth Button (physicist), but I'm not sure what disambiguator to use here. Pageviews for both pages are very similar. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support in principle. No primary topic. But he's more than a researcher. He's a professor. Kenneth Button (economist) would be better, since he's actually an economist by training and that's his main area of research. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03, Crouch, Swale, would you be fine with (economist) as the disambiguator? Sennecaster (Chat) 05:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- 👍 You did not need to ask. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Sennecaster: Yes, that probably makes more sense and my "support" was mainly for lack of primary topic rather than target. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- 👍 You did not need to ask. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- @LaundryPizza03, Crouch, Swale, would you be fine with (economist) as the disambiguator? Sennecaster (Chat) 05:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support the transport researcher has 59 views but the physicist has 50 which is close. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.