This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Yes, Mr. Thomas is notable enough to merit an article: he has written several books, contributed to more, publishes a magazine, writes for other publications, makes occasional appearances on AM and Internet radio as well as broadcast television, and lectures both in the United States and Europe on a frequent basis. Davidkevin19:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted the notability tag, but I wanted to verify the article and ... I can find no indication that anyone but himself is interested in him. Is this man notable? His books are all fringe-press or self-published; often all he contributes is a preface. He is a tiny, unimportant scribbler. If he is notable, every journalist is notable, and that's wrong. I don't think Wikipedia is damaged by the presence of this article, but ... Box2112 (talk) 23:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed for deletion. I have nothing for or against this guy, or the world in which he lives. But I can't see why he is worth an article in an encyclopedia. His publications are just not notable themselves. He isn't published by anyone but tiny presses. Almost any newspaper journalist is more notable. Box2112 (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't get inside this book using Google Books. There is no page number listed, the citation isn't completely filled out so I'm a bit wary about keeping this citation (currently #5) Is there someone who could double check this quote, who said it, that kind of thing. Sgerbic (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
