Talk:Keeps Gettin' Better

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Keeps Gettin' Better article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Keeps Gettin' Better has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 16, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 18, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Christina Aguilera Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christina Aguilera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christina Aguilera on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christina AguileraWikipedia:WikiProject Christina AguileraTemplate:WikiProject Christina AguileraChristina Aguilera articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Too Tabloid like

A couple of edits included other songs that are being released on the same day. It seems like a girls pop war and I think we should avoid those types of edits. Wiki really is not a tabloid and shouldn't come across as one.

User: Alextwa

Vandalism?

Some Britney Spears fan is saying that this contains a clip of one of her songs and keeps posting it. Should be lock this page? I listened to both songs one after another. Radar samples are not in KGB whatsoever. This is a Britney fan who wants to put Christina down. We should lock this page to route out bias.

User: Alextwa —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I agree with that Wneedham02 (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-registered users (please read)

What's with all the non-registered users deleting everything I put up? It's beginning to get annoying. I'm talking about this:

Release and reception
While initially enjoying the song, Popjustice later wrote that "There's a good argument for pop not having to care less about the future, but you'd expect someone like Christina to come up with a comeback single whose appeal lasted more than three days. There's nothing to this song. The sub-Katy Perry lyrics are empty and lifeless, Christina's vocal performance is not so much phoned in as absent-mindedly twittered from the bus stop and the production would have sounded dated and limp four years ago." ^[1]

Let me get this straight - just because it's not a positive review that doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a place on this article. It's adding information, AKA what Wiki is for. The song isn't going to be loved by everyone, learn to deal with it. When I find more official reviews I will add them later, positive or not. And therefore I will be undoing your edit if you try to delete the section. What the hell is Wiki doing still letting unregistered users edit pages anyway? :/

- I'MSKYHiGH (talk) 22:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who deleted it, but the problem is "PopJustice" is a blog and that's the reason we can't count it..!Olliyeah (talk) 23:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree popjustice is a blog!!! User: Alextwa —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

References

^ "It keeps getting worse". Popjustice. 2008-09-11. Retrieved 2008-09-13.

Information to Add

I'd like to add information I got about this single, but I can't 'cause this page is "closed". The information I have is about a chart in which "Keeps Gettin' Better" is having a very good performance. This chart is The Bulgarian Singles Chart. "Keeps getting Better" has reached the top 10 staying this week at the position number 7. You can watch it here in this webpage: http://acharts.us/bulgaria_singles_top_40/2008/45 I think this webpage has an almost-acceptable credibility. I hope any of you add this information I found. Thank you Arcad3 (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keeps Gettin' Better IS ALREADY #2 in the Turkish Chart, so please edit it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.89.239.113 (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DRUM PROGRAMMING CORRECTION

Mark Ronson did NOT do the Drum Programming for Keeps Gettin Better.

Marc Jameson did.

Please change Drums Programming: Mark Ronson to Drum Programming: Marc Jameson www.marcjameson.com www.myspace.com/marcjay

Thanks.

Creepster99 (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 01/07/09 SG[reply]

Declined, neither source you use appears to back up your assertion that Marc Jameson is correct: one site just says "new site coming soon" and the other one is a private MySpace profile that does not allow non-friends access. Bencherlite ^Talk 22:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please change Drums Programming: Mark Ronson to Drum Programming: Marc Jameson www.marcjameson.com www.myspace.com/marcjay

Check the sources again. www.marcjameson.com and www.myspace.com/marcjay will allow access. Drum programming is correctly credited to Marc Jameson. It's important that users are presented with factual information on Wikipedia.org.

Thanks. Creepster99 (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Edit Complete Creepster99 (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use in Television Promition ads?

Christina Aguilera's "Keeps Getting Better" has been used as promos for Gossip Girl & Miss Teen USA if I am not mistaken.

This is of high importance and should be included in this information page. Thanks =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.62.190.255 (talk) 06:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

genre

Aguilera stated the compilation album was an introduction to future recordings saying "Once you hear the new material you'll have a very clear idea what the direction of it is (bionic)

thats from the album page, keeps gettin better a dacade of hits, that explain it all, this album had influens in electronic music and dance. but its not teen pop, get a better source!

--Mathiassandell (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better source than musicnotes? Please, this is the OFFICIAL sheet music published by Xtina Music. IT IS teen pop, dancepop and R&B. - Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 14:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/nov/19/christina-aguilera-keeps-getting-better-pickard

Simon (talk) 07:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keeps Gettin' Better. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207170444/http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/albumreviews/a135367/christina-aguilera-keeps-gettin-better-a-decade-of-hits.html to http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/albumreviews/a135367/christina-aguilera-keeps-gettin-better-a-decade-of-hits.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "It keeps getting worse". Popjustice. 2008-09-11. Retrieved 2008-09-13.

[1]