User talk:Olliyeah

Back in the Day

Hello, umm I'm just asking why should we delete this article, Christina Aguilera anncouced on her UK website that this is the next single. You can not just go on the talk page and ask to delete it. BatterBean 23:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but on there has been a remix made and once i swear I heard it on the radio down here in Australia. So what does this say, Its her next single. But just for now leave the article until there is further information about the next single or until there says there will no more singles. BatterBean 23:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but that wasn't the case with Now That You Got It by Gwen Stefani. I said in a talk page saying I hearing it on the Australian radio, they didn't belive me and look now, its a single. And I do have source stating it is the next single. Go on the page and see. BatterBean 23:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but there are also links on the bottom saying the source. BatterBean 24:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

There is link stating that this will be the next single. BatterBean 24:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It is on the page that says its a single but underneath. BatterBean 24:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

No, theres another one and that one too states it. BatterBean 24:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh Mother release

Hello!! Are you sure that Oh Mother (Christina's 4th single) will be released only in German-speaking countries and not other parts of Europe as well? Do u have any sources or you're just assuming because the single has been released there to date?

Cya--Chronisgr (talk) 20:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

OK. I had noticed that too but it seems weird to me to have Oh Mother released only in these three German speaking countries.

Let's wait if they release it in other countries in the near future(before 2008).. By the way, have you seen the mess in B2B charts? Please help me with this.. --Chronisgr (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah but they have announced that it's going to be released only in European markets. Plus, the song had radio success in France also which could probably mean that it's going to be release there someday.

At least, I hope Christina's DVD to be released in all parts of Europe.. Well, someone keeps on editing the charts page with fake numbers..--Chronisgr (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah i deleted.. Were you the one who added it?--Chronisgr (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I deleted because it had no source therefore it shouldn't be added. If you have a source for the sales of B2B in Signapore, feel free to add them :-).

And no. I wasn't the one who wrote that Oh Mother has been airing in the UK.. i will probably delete it since there's no source for it and the single has not been released there yet.(rumours say that it will be released in the end of December there as a digital single only..)--Chronisgr (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Smile

BatterBean has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Christina Aguilera discography

Hi, sorry for reverting this edit you made. It's just that the page gets a lot of unsourced edits from IPs and I must've accidentally reverted your edit in the process. The Pop 100 is a valid addition. Anyway, happy editing. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 04:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Back to Basics LP

Hi. This is the only source about Russian sales and as far as i know it's reliable. Besides, there is no source for the platinum certification of the album but noone removed it.--Chronisgr (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh Mother Charts

Hey! Is the Croatian Chart you added an official one? It's a blog if i'm right.. And who deleted the Airplay Charts? :-(--Chronisgr (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah! Thanks for the answer. --Chronisgr (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello (Christina Aguilera song)

Hello,

Can you help me to edit Hello (Christina Aguilera song), because the article looks like a campaign by Mercedes.

And... maybe you're right but can you give me some info about "El Ultimos Adios". I don't know anything when the song was released like single. --BGTopDon (talk)

I have no idea how to rewrite the article, but the article mustn't looks like current version. Hm... I don't know if we can find some info for the article will be easier. Do you have some other offers? Btw. sorry for the bad english, I'm from Bulgaria. --BGTopDon (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't matter that I like it or not, must be with encyclopedic content. Good for start but if we must delete the surplus we must take away the "HISTORY" and this: "These events took place between the months June to September and included a myriad of commercials and finished with a party in Milan." In this part there is no information about the song. I can't find the archives from Mexico's chart,but I'm not sure that the song is entered in the chart. Hope in these days I will find some info about the song. Btw. sorry for that I've forgot my signature. --BGTopDon (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Look now the article, I think better for can't be. --BGTopDon (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

From me, another! I'm think we are ready to remove the templates. Are you think too? --BGTopDon (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't starled me. In the revision I saw there is uploaded some covers maybe. Now listen, soldier! You must find this picture! Hint; FollowYourOwnStar.com. This is the current purpose! Go! Now seriously I have to go, but I want to find realy much this cover, please if you can and if you want try to find this cover. --BGTopDon (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

What's up?

One of the administrators here helps me for the cover and he undeleted Image:Zzz-FollowStar.jpg do you think that can be the cover? Yes... there is some doubt but this is Promo Single for campaign? Can we use like some logo? --BGTopDon (talk) 12:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Second Round

Hmm, yeah... you're right, but i have some doubts, but doesn't a promo single buying from the shop with cover such as the campaign's logo in which take part or with movie's cover where the song is in the soundtrack, etc.... --BGTopDon (talk) 12:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Steppin' Out

I'm confused... this song is grammy-nominated and is not released like a single nowhere?! Do you think that song must have an article? --BGTopDon (talk), (contribs) 12:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

SDB

Hmm... the SDB is Double A-Side with Oh Mother, I'm sure in this! And btw. SDB was the top in my country's airplay... :D Oh Mother didn't enter in charts here... just little change. But I'm "strongly" sure that SDB is official single, I'll saw it on sure site. In Indonesia the chart is for record sales and there enter. And btw. if there was a video for the song maybe would enter in Bubbling Under Hot 100... :D --BGTopDon (talk), (contribs) 20:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The song is not worldwide single, released only for Asia & Oceania with "Oh Mother", but "Oh Mother" was released only for European charts. I suppose you know what's double A-side. For the bulgarian airplay, I just "throw it". ;-) --BGTopDon (talk), (contribs) 13:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know who has written A-Side..but you can't call it like that if SDB has been released in July and Oh Mother in September (at least in France)! So it's not an A-side at all..it's just misinterpretation...

Yes, there is diffren in the time of release, but SDB & Oh Mother is released Double A-Side. Just wait little time. --BGTopDon (talk), (contribs) 13:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

BMI Registred song

What? Failed Stripped songs?! Which are registred after February or Mart 2008?! Hm... I think you're wrong here. I find 3 more (some of them newer): "BEFORE YOU (Legal Title)", "FIND MYSELF AGAIN (Legal Title)", "HOLD ME ONE LAST TIME (Legal Title)", "I KNOW YOU ARE LISTENING (Legal Title)", "MIRROR (Legal Title)". Btw. I'm think that there's no connection with the song and Stripped. --BGTopDon (talk), (contribs) 15:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Music industry

God, I just wanted to tell you that you have done a really good work with your template of the Music Industry!Olliyeah (talk) 12:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Olliyeah! It means a lot to hear something like that after the numerous days I spent building it! I see you're a major fan of Christina — I'm a big fan as well. I mostly edit on the Leona Lewis side of things but I've always meant to get round to editing on the Christina article. I don't think I know quite enough about her just yet to get started though. I mean, I know how she was found and about her vocal range, and I've got all her releases. Hmmm, maybe I'll pop by some day and get involved. Thanks though, Olliyeah :) Wiki edit Jonny (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album

Sorry about that, it was indeed just a mistake. I've put it back. —Sean Whitton / 13:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Aguilera re-review

I re-reviewed the album for you! Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the lack of cite! I've been busy today. I'll do it sometime today. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album

I have nominated Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 21:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 21:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Do not recreated previously deleted material, as you did today when you recreated this article. Repeatedly doing this will result in you being blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 23:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

KGB

Not on 19th but during that week and its from an email i sent to RCA UK, i got one prior saying its to be shown soon and so isent them one asking why i havn't seen it yet and thats what they said.Wneedham02 (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Through my college, Im doing a media production course and they have contacts with RCA UK amongst others. Wneedham02 (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album

A tag has been placed on Christina Aguilera's forthcoming album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Alabama template

Thanks. You can go ahead and add it to all the relevant pages. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Your revert

Would you explain why you reinserted this with no explanation, the BLP comments were not supported by very reliable sources. — Realist² 04:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christina Aguilera B-sides and unreleased songs (2nd nomination). Thank you. Rogerb67 (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

"Dirrty" GAR notification

Dirrty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Olliyeah! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 22:12, 8 May 2010 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You've haven't been properly greeted. We're sorry, but welcome. Andewz111 (talk · contribs) (typo intended) 22:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

no problem! Thank You :) :) Olliyeah (talk) 22:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Bionic (Christina Aguilera album)

Just wondering.... where did you source the lengths from? Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

here: http://www.weltbild.de/3/16358872-1/musik/bionic.html?wea=8002019#produktbeschreibung it's pretty reliable Olliyeah (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Accession progress of Iceland

Hi, Olliyeah. I was wondering where do you get the data for Iceland's progress from? I am just curious how to monitor the progress of the screening. Regards, BloodIce (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

hi! I get it from the table which was published by the Icelandic government! I use this source (http://europe.mfa.is/media/screening/Timetable-screening-FINAL-birting.pdf).. I hope it's the right one :) Olliyeah (talk) 13:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

But there is no indication that a particular screening was finished or am I wrong? BloodIce (talk) 13:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

hmm.. good question :) yeah..but if you look at the color of the chapeters you'll see that there are 2 different types of color.. one is the explanation and the other one is bilateral.. I think that first there is the explanation and then with the bilateral talk they finish screening chapter! I mean we're still talking about the screening not the negotiation part.. once that the screening meetings for a chapter are over the screening is done :) Olliyeah (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I added some references based on this for the completion of several chapter screenings. The table you use is a tentative schedule, but we do not know if those meetings are taking place or what is the outcome. It is good source for the expected start but for the question if a chapter screen was performed and done we should use some official source I think. I wish I could understand icelandic, but my knowledge of it is level 0.5. Hehe, the negotiations are in a long way to come, that is true. :-) BloodIce (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I think you are totally wright about the colors and the bilateral meetings. It seems that the official site for the negotiation progress is lagging a day or two for publishing the statement, but since it is a busy week, the update might come at the end. Cheers, BloodIce (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Slovenia

Same-sex marriage will not be legalized. On April 7, the parliamentary committee approved amended family code, which expands rights of registered partnerships. See Recognition of same-sex unions in Slovenia. Ron 1987 (talk) 12:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

European Certificate of Succession

I'm not sure that it's legally binding. It's doubtful. European Union institutions have not power regarding family law issues. Ron 1987 (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Flags and Same-sex marriage legislation around the world

Could you give your opinion here? Ron 1987 (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you give your opinion about this edit here? Ron 1987 (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Same-sex union legislation#Article still has multiple, important issues

Hi, could you give your opinion? Ron 1987 (talk) 10:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Italy

I have limited the number of entries. Marriage bills, as you said, likely will go nowhere, but I think civil union bills have the chance for a vote. Ron 1987 (talk) 00:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Next Italian election

Hi, I have just copied down the http addres. All my citations are from scenaripolitici.it but are different one from the other. -- Nick.mon (talk) 11:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

yeah and that's okay.. try to view the history and look at what i have done just now.. maybe you'll see what I'm talking about Olliyeah (talk) 10:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh okok excuse me, I didn't understand. Ok thank you for the edits. Good bye! -- Nick.mon (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

User page

Hi, I just wanted to note that the age on your user page doesn't correspond to your date of birth. Maybe you could use {{User current age}}, then you don't have to update it :-) Regards, SPQRobin (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CuddleUp PrettyRicky.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CuddleUp PrettyRicky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Same-sex union legislation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:100%"
• 28aa01%29.pdf |title=Article 64, 1992 Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (as amended 25 December 2001 |format=PDF |accessdate=2014-01-05}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Same-sex union legislation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls Europe page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls Europe page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:List of NUTS 2 regions in the European Union by GDP

I think one of the best ways forward for the Economy of the European Union article is to remove the reliance on lists. As a result I have draft the above article, so that we can point readers in the direction of lists without having to include them in the article proper. I have noticed you are one of the few (if only) regular contributors to the article, so wanted your opinion on the draft article. The lead is yet to be written and the regions are yet to be wikilinked. Do you have any opinion on the types of data included? Jolly Ω Janner 07:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I think the idea of moving the list isn't a bad idea. However, I'm not sure about the list you created - how about moving the already existing list to the new article? I like how clear and overseeable the existing list is. It makes comparing the regions within a country and between different countries easier and maybe for someone who has little knowledge about European regions it is much more easy to understand.

I'm a big proponent of keeping the PPP per capita in percentage, because it is important for regional funding within the European Union - whenever I see that a certain region has a GDP per capita less than 75 percent of the average I instantly know that they get funds out of the Cohesion Policy - if they're between 75 and 90 percent they still get money but less than the previously mentioned group.Olliyeah (talk) 16:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

How about keeping the list with the strongest and weakest regions in the article and moving the list with all the regions in the new article?Olliyeah (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Here are some suggestions... If find the current list too disjointed to be able to compare the wealth amongst the regions, but what if we were to list the country in a separate column? One could then sort the column by country and obtain a similar result. AFAIK we have (or should have) lists within each country e.g. List of ceremonial counties in England by gross value added to look at the regions within a country. Second issue of the PPP per capita percentage... what if we were to write what the 75% and 90% percentile of GDP PPS per capita was in the lead. We have to consider that not everyone (in fact, probably very few people) are reading the list for the purpose of seeing which regions receive EU funding. Hopefully these proposals can resolve (to some extent) your recommendations. Jolly Ω Janner 20:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not completely sure how that's going to look like, but if you keep the percentages I'm fine with it :D (sorry I'm a bit of a numbers freak). I agree to add the part about regional funding. Additionally I've realized that for some regions we use the English term (like for example Italy: South Tyrol, Lombardy etc.), while for other regions the "regional" term (Sweden: Övre Norrland). How about only using the English term? It would be easier to understand. (By the way, I didn't create any of those lists in the article - so I'm not biased towards my own work :D). Regarding the other discussion about the "Economic variation" & "Economies of member states" tables:

I agree on the use of English words for regions and will do that as much as possible. On the matter of GDP (PPP) per capita, we need to consider what our readers want instead of what you want. Readers may want to know what the actual GDP (PPP) per capita is and they may also want to know it in relative terms to the EU average. If we listed it in relative terms, readers would have to do maths (multiply the ratio to EU average by the EU absolute average)... assuming they know how to. If we listed it in absolute terms, readers would only need to remember that the 90% band is 24,750 and 75% is 20,625. A further suggestion I propose is to have two table, one for NUTS level 1 and one for NUTS level 2. NUTS level 3 will be provided as a URL in "further reading" or "external links", as there are over 2,000. Jolly Ω Janner 20:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh no sorry, I didn't mean it in that way. I would have added GDP (PPP) per capita and the percentages. But if you really don't like it, I'll give up. :) I completely agree with the idea of separating NUTS 1 and 2 and just providing the link for NUTS3. Olliyeah (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I will add the percentage too, since after doing some research, this is probably the most used statistics among secondary sources. There should still be space for all these columns. Jolly Ω Janner 19:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I have since added the table for NUTS level 1. It took a bit longer than I thought to create all the wikilinks, so maybe not be able to update the NUTS level 2 list right now. Any feedback on the level 1 list? Jolly Ω Janner 07:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Looks good 2 me.Olliyeah (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Member state sorted by GDP	GDP (Nominal) 2015 billions of euro	GDP (PPP) per capita 2014 euro	GDP (PPP) per capita 2014 EU28 = 100	Public debt % of GDP (2014)	Deficit (-)/ Surplus (+) % of GDP (2014)	Inflation % Annual (2015)	Unemp. % 2016 M1
European Union	14,625,373	27,400	100%	86.8	−3.0	0.0	8.9
Germany	3,026.6	34,500	124%	74.9	0.3	0.1	4.3
United Kingdom	2,568.1	29,900	109%	88.2	−5.7	0.0	5.1(M11)
France	2,183.6	29,300	107%	95.6	−3.9	0.1	10.2
Italy	1,636.4	26,400	96%	132.3	−3.0	0.1	11.5

I've dropped population, Eurozone member, GDP % of EU and annual change % of GDP. I additionally dropped the nominal GDP per capita. Can we agree on this as a first step? :D Olliyeah (talk) 14:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

I would make two recommendations. To add nominal GDP per capita and to convert GDP per capita (PPP) to absolute. AFAIK, the allocation of EU regional funding isn't done on a national level, so the relative PPP per capita holds no use in this context. Jolly Ω Janner 20:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the idea of using the GDP (nominal) per capita instead of PPP. I think PPP is more helpful, since it takes the price level into account. So I think it's a better tool to compare "the wealth/income/production" between countries.Olliyeah (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Absolute PPS per capita is a number measured in Euros. Relative PPS per capita is expressed as a percentage relative to the EU average. I'm not suggesting removing PPS per capita, but converting its format.

I'm sorry about the confusion. So just to get it right - u want GDP (nominal), GDP (nominal) per capita and GDP (PPP) per capita. Thats what u meant, right?Olliyeah (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

in the meantime:

Member state sorted by GDP	GDP (Nominal) in billions of euro (2015)	GDP (Nominal) per capita 2015 euro	GDP (PPP) per capita 2014 euro	Public debt % of GDP (2014)	Deficit (-)/ Surplus (+) % of GDP (2014)	Inflation % Annual (2015)	Unemp. % 2015
European Union	14,625.3	27,400(2014)	27,400	86.8	−3.0	0.0	9.4
Germany	3,026.6	37,100	34,500	74.9	0.3	0.1	4.6
United Kingdom	2,568.0	39,400	29,900	88.2	−5.7	0.0	5.3
France	2,183.6	32,200(2014)	29,300	95.6	−3.9	0.1	10.4
Italy	1,636.4	26,900	26,400	132.3	−3.0	0.1	12.7(2014)
Spain	1,081.2	23,300	25,000	99.3	−5.9	-0.6	22.1
Netherlands	677.8	40,000	35,900	68.2	−2.4	0.2	6.9
Sweden	444.2	45,300	33,700	44.9	−1.7	0.7	7.4
Poland	427.8	11,100	18,600	50.4	−3.3	-0.7	7.5
Belgium	409.8	36,500	32,500	106.7	−3.1	0.6	8.3
Austria	337.2	39,100	35,500	84.2	-2.7	0.8	5.6(2014)
Denmark	266.1	46,800	34,200	45.1	1.5	0.2	6.2
Finland	207.2	37,800	30,300	59.3	−3.3	-0.2	9.4
Ireland	189.0(2014)	41,000(2014)	36,800	107.5	−3.9	0.0	12.7(2014)
Portugal	179.4	17,300	21,400	130.2	−7.2	0.5	12.6
Greece	176.0	16,200	19,900	178.6	−3.6	−1.1	24.9
Romania	159.8	8,000	15,200	39.9	−1.4	-0.4	6.8
Czech Republic	154.7(2014)	14,700(2014)	23,200	42.7	−1.9	0.3	5.1
Hungary	108.7	11,100	18,600	76.2	−2.5	0.1	6.8
Slovakia	78.1	14,400	21,100	53.5	-2.8	−0.3	11.5
Luxembourg	48.9(2014)	87,600(2014)	73,000	23.0	1.4	0.1	6.1
Bulgaria	44.2	6,100	12,800	27.0	−5.8	−1.1	9.4
Croatia	43.9	10,400	16,100	85.1	−5.6	-0.3	16.6
Slovenia	38.5	18,700	22,600	80.8	−5.0	-0.8	9.1
Lithuania	37.2	12,800	20,600	40.7	−0.7	-0.7	9.1
Latvia	24.4	12,300	17,500	40.6	−1.5	0.2	9.9
Estonia	20.5	15,600	20,900	10.4	0.7	0.1	7.4(2014)
Cyprus	17.4	20,600	22,400	108.2	−8.9	−1.6	15.6
Malta	8.8	20,400	23,600	68.3	−2.1	1.2	5.3

• I'd suggest using the same time frame i.e. 2014 for GDP nominal. On the matter of unemployment, it's a little bizarre that it uses monthly data. If Eurostat provide an annualised rate, that would be ideal, since the rest of the statistics are annual. If not, stick to December 2015 and call it 2015 Dec.. I'm not sure what reference number 7 is being used for. All the statistics seem to be covered under "EU28" in the Eurostat tables. I'm also open to the possibility of using GDP growth rate, but that's your call. Jolly Ω Janner 23:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
• PS here is an annulised unemployment rate for the EU 28 countries from Eurostat. Hopefully 2015 data for all countries is less than a month away, since a few countries are only one month behind in the monthly data. Jolly Ω Janner 23:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Number 7 was a mistake - wasn't supposed to be there. I'll keep the time frame in mind next year - the remaining data will be updated in the upcoming months, so I don't wanna change it back again. I thought about keeping GDP growth as well, but on the other hand there's a whole list on economic growth, so I thought it wasn't necessary. I thought it would be interesting to always keep the most recent figures (regarding unemployment), but it makes sense to use the same figures. Changed it :)Olliyeah (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, should the "EU candidates" and "EFTA members" tables be removed or should I change them as well?Olliyeah (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I've made some adjustments at User:Jolly Janner/sandbox. I have changed the wikilink to direct to the economy articles of the countries (I feel this will be far more useful, as linking to countries is normally discouraged in prose articles anyway). I have also removed bolded statistics (don't know why they were bolded in the first place). I have replaced (2014) with a footnote style to improve readability. I've also added a hidden comment reminding editors to update the accessdates on the citations and given the citations an overall cleanup (publisher etc). I would recommend removing candidates and other European countries from the table. They could warrant a very brief mention in the history section (if there even is one), but not a detailed breakdown of their economic data. I think we're getting close to replacing the content in the article now. Afterwards I should get round to rewriting some background information about what all these statistics represent. Jolly Ω Janner 07:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Agree, agree and agree Olliyeah (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Olliyeah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Olliyeah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Olliyeah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Olliyeah.jpg

The file File:Olliyeah.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:17, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of the European Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pannonian Croatia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of European Union regions by GDP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pannonian Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

sources Template:Same-sex marriage opinion polls worldwide

Hi. Could you review your source, please? Some of the numbers don't add up -- support + oppose + neither aren't 100%. Thanks. — kwami (talk) 06:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)