Talk:Katherine Clark

Katherine Clark was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 12, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

United States: Massachusetts / State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Katherine Clark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grammarxxx (talk · contribs) 00:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick response, huh? But really, right off the back, this article is not GA material, but let's try to fix that.

Early concerns

Try to have this article have a style similar to the other MA Congressional Reps (they're almost all GA's)
Infobox dates - I know they're hard to find, but let's try to get exact dates for taking and leaving office
The intro's a tad short, and doesn't focus on her career (what has she done, what's it matter if she lives in Melrose?)
"Early life, education, and law career" - there isn't enough of any of that stuff in the article
House & Senate - combine these two sections and add more
"2013 congressional election" - again, needs more info and to be in a general "U.S. House..." section

This is a good place to start, but there is more to be done. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 00:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Katherine Clark/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Not familiar with the subject, but using an existing GA on a similar topic (Joseph P. Kennedy III) on what to expect.
Starting at the end first, concerns with references:
- Bare URLs e.g. refs 11, 40, 42, 43.
- Incomplete refs, e.g. refs 18, 37, 41 etc (be consistent with the amount of data you provide, e.g. retrieval dates should be present for the online sources consistently). PDFs should be listed as PDFs and have page numbers/ranges included.
- Reliability, what makes "Ballotpedia" reliable?
Back to the top, the lead only summarises her very recent career, it should summarise the whole article.
Not sure why you feel the need to repeat her full name in the "Early life and career" section.
"She studied abroad in" is "abroad" really needed since it's obvious that Japan isn't in the US.
"...state Office of Child Care Services." unreferenced.
"She moved to Melrose..." new para, start as "Clark moved..." Check for other instances.
" Massachusetts State Senate" appears to simply be called "Massachusetts Senate", shouldn't you be referring to it by its formal and correct name?
Would put the " 57%-43%" after "lost" rather than leave it to the end of the sentence.
Festa mentioned three times in one sentence is poor prose.
"That year she was appointed " new para, use "Clark", and avoid starting new paragraphs with a prose dependency on the previous paragraph.
" 63%-37%" just check that's using an en-dash please.
" tax (increase) certainly " shouldn't that be [increase] if you're not quoting totally directly? Or did she say (increase)?
Link pro-choice appropriately.
"he year awards from the Massachusetts Municipal Association and the " avoid this kind of external linking.
"which are often used as pawns in abusive relationships" sounds like personal opinion/OR.
wiretapping is a little colloquial for me, perhaps "telephone tapping".
"2013–2015" see WP:DATERANGE.

Quite a bit to do, so I'll put it on hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No activity here, so I've failed the nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Someone deleted the official photo of Katherine Clark as a copyright violation. Could someone run to her site [1]. pick up the press kit, and upload a suitable photograph to the suitable place? MarkBernstein (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC) That is not what she looks like at all. She is much older than that picture. Get an accurate one. 98.10.165.90 (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Office Assumption

I noticed that the infobox on this article says she assumed office on December 10, 2013 whereas the article for the 114th US Congress says she was formally installed December 12, 2013. Which is right?--DeathTrain (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katherine Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20171022024104/https://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71 to https://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=71&sectiontree=2,71

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hometown: Revere or Melrose or not worth specifying?

Given that she was born in Connecticut and lived 20 years and was first elected in Melrose, is it really worth calling "Revere" her "hometown"? Yes, Revere is listed as her residence since 2021, but seems somewhere between misleading (only lived here <2 years) and invasive (do we need to specify at all?) to call it "hometown." KevinCuddeback (talk) 22:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that's the spirit of "hometown". For example, I always consider my hometown to be the place where I grew up, not where I live now (despite how long I've now lived in my current city). She now appears as "(D-Revere)", so there's relevance in mentioning Revere somewhere, but hopefully without using the term "hometown". Grk1011 (talk) 14:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you agree and you put it nicely: hometown has a spirit--an "emotional" (POV) dimension--that I removed by changing it to "home city of Revere" (and Revere, is, in fact, a City)KevinCuddeback (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

arrest of son

Her son was arrested on January 21, 2023 for defacing the Parkman Bandstand Monument in Boston Common with the tagging "ACAB" and assault. Adding two more sources because this was reverted.[2] [3][4] Artedm (talk) 21:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

another source [5] Artedm (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only a single one of those sources link the event to Katherine Clark, and even so, this is a clear WP:BLPCRIME issue. If you're using different sources to "establish" facts like this (one showing a thing happened, a separate one showing that they're related), that's not how sourcing on Wikipedia works. We would want reliable sources that report on all of these facts. But again, the arrest (not even conviction) of a non-notable relative of an article subject is not appropriate for the page. Parabolist (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

see another source including a response from the Congresswoman [6] Artedm (talk) 00:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now you can understand why going so gung ho would've been a mistake, since the original even lower quality sources you had misgendered the subject. Of course, you still need to overcome the fact that this is a WP:BLPCRIME violation, and establish why this is notable for Clark's page. My point about sourcing was more trying to help you in the future. Parabolist (talk) 04:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contraception

Will the banning of contraception also include the use of condoms, which are also used for contraception? Jeanmariell (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

House Appropriations Committee

Wikipedia states that she sits on the house appropriations committee, but it appears that she is not currently a member. She was a member in the 117th congress, but appears to no longer be on it. ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.24.77.51 (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://appropriations.house.gov/about/membership

[1] ttps://appropriations.house.gov/about/membership

[1]