User talk:Artedm

This is Artedm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe O'Dea (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe O'Dea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joe O'Dea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artedm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi McMatter-

This is a page about a major party candidate for the United State Senate in Colorado who just received 319,315 votes yesterday. The candidate he beat Ron Hanks has a wikipedia page so I don't understand you saying Joe shouldn't have a page. You can google Joe O'Dea so many sources. Thanks Artedm (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe O'Dea (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still fails WP:NPOL until there is coverage about them outside of the political front or they win an actual election they are not considered notable. See also WP:BLP1E as the only press currently is only to due to this primary race and election.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe O'Dea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joe O'Dea, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi McMatter-

This is a page about a major party candidate for the United State Senate in Colorado who just WON an election and received 319,315 votes. The candidate he beat Ron Hanks has a wikipedia page so I don't understand you saying Joe shouldn't have a page. You can google Joe O'Dea so many sources. Thanks

Artedm (talk) 03:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primaries are not considered elections for the purpose of WP:NPOL, he is still only a candidate and candidates are not considered notable unless they are notable for other reasons and so far no other reason has been presented or proven through sourcing. WP:BLP1E applies here as the only story about him have been in his run for senate and until he is actually elected to the senate. Ron Hanks however, is notable because he is an elected official at the state level. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

three 2022 united states senate candidates who have just won a primary all have wikipedia pages see Katie_Britt Joe_Pinion Jo_Rae_Perkins a former Colorado us senate nominee also has a wikipedia page Darryl Glenn. Remember senator is a statewide position/ election. You can have many candidates for school board, city council, mayor, state representative, state senator but this is united states senate only 100 senators. Artedm (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerry Selbee (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jerry Selbee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jerry Selbee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 08:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Akevsharma why would a movie about a person Jerry & Marge Go Large have a page but not the real person? Artedm (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danny Moore (Colorado)

The article Danny Moore (Colorado) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NPOL - candidacy for office does not meet notability criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melcous (talk) 11:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline WP:POLITICIAN WP:NPOL WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV Artedm (talk) 15:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danny Moore (Colorado) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Moore (Colorado) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Moore (Colorado) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Assirian cat (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline WP:POLITICIAN WP:NPOL WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV Artedm (talk) 15:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clozee moved to draftspace

Because it clearly is not ready for mainspace due to including several empty sections, totally lacking sources, and not having a credible claim of significance * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pppery checkout https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee Artedm (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to click the "submit your draft for review" button once you've added enough sources and content to make a full-fledged article rather than a placeholder. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Draft:Clozee"

Draft:Clozee, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dr.Pinsky this has nothing to do with advertising. checkout https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee Artedm (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that nomination and warning. Got your edit mixed up with someone else. Happy editing. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Artedm! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clozee (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. There is insufficient evidence that the subject's achievements meet the notability criteria for a biography on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clozee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary Hi she already has a wikipedia in french https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee Artedm (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artedm, yes, she does. However IMO her achievements don't meet the general notability requirements for a biography on WP. You are welcome to re-submit the draft if you wish it to be re-reviewed. MurielMary (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clozee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Clozee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi she already has a wikipedia in french https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clozee Artedm (talk) 10:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CloZee (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CloZee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CloZee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CloZee. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MurielMary she already has a page in french w:fr:Clozee Artedm (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe O'Dea (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still doesn't satisfy NPOL, so why is this being resubmitted?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe O'Dea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CloZee (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CloZee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Clozee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Clozee. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 10:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MurielMary you must really not like her as you said "IMO her achievements are not notable" as you mentioned on September 13. All the sources are independent and again she has a wikipedia in french. Artedm (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alev Aydin

Hello, Artedm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alev Aydin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kenzie Anne

Hello, Artedm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kenzie Anne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clozee

@Artedm: That article you moved out of draft was in a poor condition to say the least and I've had to copyedit it down to a bare stub. To say that somehow the article was in decent condition for mainspace is disengenous. The French article is in an even worse condition than this article and saying that due of the presence of the French article that they're should be an article on here, is incorrect. This wikipedia has an higher standards than what is acceptable on the fr wikipedia. While it is pefectly legal to move your stuff out of draft, there is the understanding which is consensus based, that the article must be in a fit state for mainspace and that wasn't. Please do not make a habit of it. scope_creep^Talk 07:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Clozee, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 07:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi looks like you removed information on an independently sourced performance? Artedm (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jerry Selbee

Hello, Artedm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jerry Selbee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jerry Selbee

Hello, Artedm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jerry Selbee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SoFi Stadium

Fair point man, we have stuff up to 2028. So yeah anything in 2023 and 2024 is all fair and shouldn't be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.183.180 (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joe O'Dea

Hello, Artedm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joe O'Dea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joe O'Dea

Hello, Artedm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joe O'Dea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]