Talk:Kamen Rider Blade

Synopsis

There is no synopsis for Kamen Rider Blade?Jutari 06:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Trivia

I just added Blade and Chalice's tarot-card references under Trivia. Does anyone know if "Garren" and "Leangle" refer in any way to alternate names for the tarot suits of Coins and Staves? -- Asterphage 05:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Leangle uses a staff, obviously. I've been puzzling over Garren for a while myself. Perhaps diamonds, being valuable, can be construed as coins? But that starts to smell of original research, so... Howa0082 14:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Garren is how "galleon" is pronounced by the Japanese, galleon is a coin, Garren is coins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.246.140.25 (talk) 19:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Black Joker

Is there any links or proofs available to lead one to call Joker "Black Joker"? His name is Joker, there's a White Joker in the movie, but that doesn't make Hajime "black Joker." I'm thinking of changing it back to just Joker with a mention of this White/Black Joker thing.

I think stay as Black Joker. That way we can tell the difference between Chalice and Glaive.--MaskedRiderGatack 23:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Black Joker was never a canonical name, and using it is original research. Furthermore, Glaive is strictly an out-of-continuity character, and should not have much focus. jgp ^T_C 23:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Split off Undead section

In an attempt to do some clean up on this page, what would everyone think about splitting off the Undead section into a separate article titled something like "Undead (Kamen Rider Blade)"? This has been done on other Kamen Rider articles and I think that since the list of Undeads has grown so long it should be split off. Since the current structure lengthens the table of contents excessively, splitting the Undeads will help with this too. The content of the new article would encompass all the different Undead categories and the trials. Any thoughts? (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC))

I don't see much of a problem with it. Howa0082 14:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

That would not be appropriate. The Undead do NOT meet WP:FICT and do not need their own article, nor do we need to go into extensive detail and list every last Undead. For the most part, a general description is all that is necessary or needed. This is not the place for minute details about the series. That can go on an anime wiki or wikia. AnmaFinotera (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Characters

The main article should only have the main characters of the series, not every last one of them. The list here is far too long. It needs to be culled down to the most central characters. For the rest, I'd suggest starting a List of Kamen Rider Blade characters and moving them there. AnmaFinotera (talk) 22:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Constant reformattings

Enough of this AnmaFinotera. I am trying to bring the page into consistency with the more recent pages, and even though there is no MoS for WP:TOKU, this article does not have to strictly adhere to the guidelines of WP:TV. The structure of the page is perfectly fine the way I had un-re-reformatted it, such that it is similar to Kamen Rider Den-O, Juken Sentai Gekiranger, Kamen Rider Kiva, and Engine Sentai Go-onger. While there is no consistency now (several of the Showa series article need to be reformatted, and a good amount of the Heisei series articles do, too), that does not mean that there won't be consistency amongst these pages in the future. Unless the only reasoning you have for constantly undoing my edits is that WP:TV's MoS trumps the formatting of articles that really had no problems to begin with, I don't see why the version already existed and that I replaced and fixed up should not be on this page.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Whatever. Despite being an "admin" you obviously will do whatever you like and force your own personal style preference on these articles despite the fact that it is a television series and therefore falls under the TV MoS. Doesn't matter, your "style" will never pass FA anyway, so they can continue being a bunch of low quality articles. AnmaFinotera (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I have not done anything using my administrative bit here.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kamen Rider Blade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927220710/http://www.toei-video.co.jp/DVD/sp21/blade.html to http://www.toei-video.co.jp/DVD/sp21/blade.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)