Jump to content

Talk:MKM Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:KCOM Stadium)
Good articleMKM Stadium has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed

Sad and pathetic

[edit]

I find the edit dated 27/09/2006 sad, pathetic and pointless:

Changing:

"The stadium is home to Hull City A.F.C. (football) and Hull FC (rugby league)"
to:
"The stadium is home to Hull FC (rugby league) and Hull City A.F.C. (football)"

is completely lame and must have been done by an 8-year old.

I'm not going to lower myself to their level by being petty enough to revert it though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.69.191.231 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 27 September 2006

[edit]

Please visit Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/KC_Stadium_at_night if you are interested in having the picture of the KC Stadium raised to the status of featured picture or if you think that it definitely shouldn't be featured. Thanks, ...adam... (talk • contributions) 19:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent housekeeping

[edit]

Keith D and I have gone through this article over the past few days, finding sources, copyediting, making corrections, etc. There are a few more items to tackle here that I'll try to get to this week/weekend. When that's taken care of, we thought we'd try to get this reviewed for Good Article status. Doonhamer 14:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If any one else has any further items they think needs attention then add them to the list. Keith D 15:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removed this sentence; was unable to find a reference for it: Each club has priority use of the stadium at the end of the season for each sport; for instance, Hull FC receive priority during the early part of the football season, the situation being reversed at the early part of the rugby season. Doonhamer 18:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the good work on this Doonhamer. I think we should go for a GA review now. Keith D 11:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Keith. During your hols I asked Beve and Mattythewhite, regular contributors to Hull City topics, to have a look-over. They've also left feedback on my talk page. I think you're right; a bit more tweaking and we should go for the GA. Doonhamer 14:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's a problem with this paragraph:
In spite of a number of obstacles during the course of the project, including Hull City A.F.C.'s receivership in 2001, the stadium complex was completed on time (in fourteen months) and on budget (at approximately GB£44 million). The stadium opened its doors on December 18, 2002.
It makes it sound as though there were problems during the construction, which isn't the case. Construction must have started in Autumn 2001 (fourteen months before it opened in December 2002), Adam Pearson's takeover of Hull City took place in March 2001 - several months earlier.
If anything, the project couldn't even begin (or move past the planning stage) while City were in financial difficulty, and it was only Pearson's takeover of the club that allowed it to go from theory to reality. In fact, as I recall it, Pearson was instrumental in drving it forward, and strongly deserves a mention (if we can source this as fact).
Beve 12:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers Beve, appreciate your feedback here and on my talk page. I agree with your recommendations and changes, I'll work on the paragraph above. The info came right from the source I used at the city council website, which was a bit of a summary and a bit glossy. Doonhamer 14:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited that part to reflect the source more accurately, that Hull City's receivership occured just after planning permission was granted. I think that addresses Beve's concern. Doonhamer 20:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership

[edit]

The article seems to indicate that the stadium is the soccer teams and the football team is the tennants. If anything it is the other way round. Also there should be a much bigger mention of test match football at the ground in the past and in the upcoming test series against the Kiwis. Londo06 20:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in learning how you get this impression. The lead paragraphs state clearly:


How does this indicate to you that "the stadium is the soccer teams and the football team is the tennants." ? Doonhamer 22:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

During their (FC) stint at the KC Stadium. The stadium is regularly seen on Sky Sports as a rugby league ground, it would seem prudent to name FC as the first tenant, Hull City as the 2nd tenant. Londo06 22:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't really answer the question of how you thought the football club was somehow the stadium's owner (as clearly proven otherwise by the quote), and, at any rate, to state that the stadium "is regularly seen on Sky Sports as a rugby league ground" is matter of personal opinion. Does Sky Sports clearly state that "The KC Stadium is clearly a rugby ground"? Would it do so in December? The football club is listed first simply as a matter of alphabetics: Hull City Association (or Athletic) Football Club comes before Hull Football Club, and Hull City A.F.C. comes before Hull. F.C. Doonhamer 22:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination?

[edit]

I added a few sentences to the Concerts section and tried to address Beve's recommendations. I agree with Keith D. Ready to nominate? Doonhamer 20:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Comment

[edit]

Although I do not intend to be the reviewer, I think you guys need to consider moving this to Kingston Communications Stadium. The current location does not fit well with WP:NAME and being from the states, I was under the impression that this article would be about a stadium in Kansas City, Missouri. A move would solve any WP:D issues. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  04:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I've thought the same myself, and have actually tried to move the page as you say at one point. However, I was prevented from doing so because that move is protected, for some reason. I'm not sure how to check why that is. Doonhamer 05:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is known as the KC Stadium to sports fans and also for concerts. What would be printed on the tickets is more relevant than what might be in an insurance document. A redirect would suffice if possible. Londo06 08:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kingston Communications Stadium is already a redirect to KC Stadium. Keith D 09:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After checking the MOS section on common names, I'm agreeing with Londo06 and Keith D that KC Stadium seems more appropriate, although my personal preference is for the full name. Jmfangio also makes a valid point, however: in terms of raw numbers, there are likely more users of the English Wikipedia who would assume the term refers to the stadium where the Kansas City Chiefs play, rather than where Hull FC do. There's been at least one edit where that seemed to be the case. :o) However, I'm content to leave things the way they are now. Doonhamer 15:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

[edit]

Generally looking good, but two or three minor issues to clear up before the article passes:

As there is evidently no easy answer to this using the available sources, I won't view it as a obstacle to passing GA. It'd be nice to have a confirmed reason, but not absolutely essential. Oldelpaso 18:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I simply assumed that the total capacity was an accurate figure whereas the figures given for each stand were approximate. Beve 22:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article asserts that "the KC Stadium was judged to have the best access and facilities in the country", but the reference mentions "comfort, services and view", a subtle but important difference.
  • The references do not support the assertion that Hull City "regularly attracted some of the best attendances outside the Premiership" - one gives data for Division Three and the other gives division averages only.
    • This was a bit convoluted I suppose; one reference shows that Hull City's average attendance in Div 3 was ~16,000; the other shows that in recent years, only Premiership clubs and some Championship sides approach that figure. Will rewrite for clarity.

Apart from this, the article is generally well-written, is well referenced and gives a good degree of comprehensiveness. The images are suitably licensed and there is no evidence of edit-warring. If the issued listed above are resolved, the nomination will be passed.

Other suggested improvements which do not affect the outcome of the GA nomination but should be considered if a featured article nomination is intended:

  • The two single-paragraph subsections in Other sporting events should probably be merged.
  • What is the record attendance at the stadium?
    • Futuristic. :o) Probably the upcoming match between Hull City and Chelsea in the League Cup. Will try to find the current record.
      • I found this, seems curent, but not sure it counts as a reliable source, and it only mentions football, not rugby or any other event. Comments? Doonhamer 15:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Actually, I see that we already use that figure and source in the Other Sporting Events section. Doonhamer 15:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
          • I have put the current record for Hull City & Hull FC in their section, indicated league match for City as I would expect a sell out for the Chelsea match, for security purposes depends on them allowing a capacity crowd. Keith D 15:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
            • The record attendance was early in the stadium's existence, for an England U21's game where there was no segregation. After that, it was for the game against Leeds last season, I think (it was announced over the tannoy). Beve 22:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • While of sufficient standard for GA, some areas of the prose could be polished further. Two such examples:
  • What is the point of having a former names field in the infobox if there has never been a name change?  Done Keith D 14:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oldelpaso 12:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for taking time to do the review. Will see if we can work on the points raised. Keith D 13:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed; thanks much. Doonhamer 14:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed

[edit]

While the stands/ground capacity question remains unconfirmed, the other points have been fixed, so I have no qualms about passing the nomination. Oldelpaso 18:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again very much for the review and the recommendations to improve the article. Doonhamer 19:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. Keith D 19:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ground upgrade

[edit]

Alot of talk from the Hull FC fans that there will be a 2nd tier added to the East Stand. Hull City given heroes reception With further sources worth working in I reckon.Londo06 17:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some one has just added a note into the lead but without reference, has anyone got recent details on the planned increase in capacity so that the addition can be referenced and a new section created about the upgrade. Keith D (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Web site

[edit]

Has anyone got any details of when the stadium web site will be back in action it has been down for essential maintenance for a couple of months now. Keith D (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let people know that the web site is back on air but has been restructured so some of the references no longer work. I have changed the main facts reference as I could find that one. Keith D (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've started updating reference links. In many cases it was simply easier to find a new reference. I've gone through about the first quarter. Northumbrian (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've gone through all the references, fixing/replacing/removing per the update history. I believe everything works now, but other contributors are welcome to double-check. Northumbrian (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capacity

[edit]

The reference for the stadium capacity now shows 25,586 has the capacity been changed recently or is the original figure incorrect? Keith D (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the capacity must have changed. Have amended the page to show the source's current figure. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Probably needs changing in various other articles as well. Keith D (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:MKM Stadium/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
.
  1. The part about SMC & take over appears in lead but not in article body. May be move sentence to body of article and flesh out a bit. I actually removed the sentence for now; it's easy enough to source and put back. I'll look at other stadium articles and see how relevant/encyclopedic sections on ownership of stadium operating companies is.  Doonhamer | Banter  14:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)  Done Doesn't seem to add anything to the article.  Doonhamer | Banter  16:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Details of construction would be a useful section (e.g. who built)  Done Addressed in the History section.  Doonhamer | Banter  16:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Average attendances - a similar list for Hull FC would balance article  Done
  4. Some interior photographs would be good. I've written to the stadium to see what sort of permission/attribution is needed for pictures of the interior of the stadium. I anticipate a response by Monday, 13 August.  Doonhamer | Banter  22:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC) No response from the stadium. Still researching.  Doonhamer | Banter  16:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)  Done A mate of mine took a few photos of the stadium interior before a match today and sent them on; loaded one to the Commons and added it to the article.  Doonhamer | Banter  20:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May be worth a try for GA review Keith D 21:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Automated Review== Hopes this helps the above users:

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 16:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Ownership pt.2

[edit]

I notice in the infobox KCOM is currently listed as one of the owners of the stadium. I thought the council were the sole owners of the stadium, and that it was built with money from the sale of KC shares. I know that KC/KCOM have sponsored the stadium since it was built, but sponsorship does not confer ownership. Or is Hull City are part owned by Flamingo Land now? This also does not match up with, for example, the Emirates stadium, which has also been sponsored since it was built, but on its wikipedia entry is down as being owned by Arsenal Holdings.

During the discussions of the Allam family wanting to buy the stadium in 2010, there was no mention of KC being involved in negotiations between the family and the council.

I would propose that this section be amended to show that only Hull City Council is the owner of stadium. If I am wrong, and KCOM does have some level of ownership, then really this should be referenced, shouldn't it?

Ph 1980 (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can determine that KCOM are only involved in sponsorship of the stadium and that Hull City Council actually own the stadium, though the Superstadium Management Company (SMC), not very consistent as just Stadium Management Company in places, are in charge of day to day operations.
May be the name of the article should be changed to KCOM Stadium, as it has been rebranded, though they have not got round to updating the website yet. Keith D (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on KCOM Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on KCOM Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KCOM Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

[edit]

From 25 June 2021, the stadium is to be branded MKM Stadium after MKM Building Supplies Ltd took over the naming rights.[1] We normally do not use sponsored names but the only other name it has ever had is Hull City Stadium but that is not widely known or used. Any thoughts? Keith D (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change to MKM Stadium (and to whatever it changes to in five years if needed), Hull City Stadium appears to only be used for UEFA competitions rather than it being an official name, and does not take into account it also being the home of the rugby team. EdwardUK (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree on MHM Stadium, as there is no primacy between football and rugby league usage at the stadium, so it would be wrong for wikipedia to indicate there is one. Also there are two rugby league grounds within the City of Hull, so there are grounds for confusion by moving it away from the current branded name structure.Fleets (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "SMC & MKM Announce New Stadium Sponsorship Deal". Hull City A.F.C. 25 June 2021. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MKM_Stadium&oldid=1208403423"