Talk:Joseph Chamberlain Memorial Clock Tower

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I really don't like this page being called Old Joe. As well as it not being the official name for the clock tower it isnt even the sole nickname for it. I did change it to its official name but as there were so many links to it still using Old Joe I reverted because I haven't got the time to change them all. It is however great that the clock has its own page! Cls14 13:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it but I'm unsure where these links to Old Joe are coming from as I thought most were from a template - the link I have changed - but it still remains. I think it is best here anyway. - Erebus555 18:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know when the qualifier Old started to be added to Joe in the nickname? I was at the University in the 70s, and it was plain Joe then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.75.11.89 (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a local, before I was a student, it was known as Little Joe. Raisedonadiet (talk) 08:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I lived in the area for six years and never heard it referred to as Little Joe which seems a bit of an odd name, maybe a tongue-in-cheek local reference? It was referred to, often officially by the university and Guild, as Old Joe in the 2000s and the fact that an asteroid was named '[...]OldJoe' after it in 1989 shows that that name has been used for around 30 years at least. Mountain^cirque 09:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weights

Can anyone shed any light on the difference in weights specified here and at University of Birmingham (6.5 tonnes versus 6.5 tons)? Also, the weight given here seems to have been changed from 6 tonnes to 6.5 tonnes at some stage. Does anyone know which is correct? Cordless Larry 19:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Height

The 2008 official university study guide states that the tower is 110m. It seems likely to me that all previous references to it being exactly 100m were acts of 'rounding up'. As it stands the university guide is the most reputable source I think we have, and it seems unlikely that it would arbitrarily describe it as 110m unless it were fairly certain - so I imagine this is the best estimate.--81.155.85.77 (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply at Talk:University of Birmingham. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide

I think that unless there are records pertaining to students committing suicide from the clock tower this sentence should be removed. Any other thoughts? 147.188.213.167 (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't heard rumours about failing exams when standing underneath the clock when I was a post-graduate student at BU, but I was told it was bad luck to walk underneath, and that it probably was because of the suicides... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.80.56.148 (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a fact that it has been closed to students due to the suicide risk and access is limited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argenton (talk • contribs) 18:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Chamberlain Memorial Clock Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081030215503/http://www.ctbuh.org/Portals/0/Tallest/CTBUH_TallestClockGovernmentPalace.pdf to http://www.ctbuh.org/Portals/0/Tallest/CTBUH_TallestClockGovernmentPalace.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]