Talk:Joker (character)/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Too long, not "normie" enough

I just came here to look up basic info about him and found this incredibly dense triviavomit article that is written for fans who already know the basics and want to dive into the details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.55.242 (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Super sanity

@Darkwarriorblake: I was reading through the Origins section and I noticed that it doesn't discuss the idea of Joker being "supersane" and constantly reinventing himself in response to the stimuli around him. This was first proposed in Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth and was a staple of Grant Morrison's Batman saga. I think it is too important to leave out, especially since it ties into the "multiple choice" aspect of his origin. Darkknight2149 04:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

It's mentioned at the start of the Personality section but it's not called super sanity there, just describes the effect as per your above comment. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 12:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Joker skills in combat

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Can I have the permission to add a little content about the character's skills and abilities in combat, please? Ales Mansay (talk) 20:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

"The Joker is portrayed as skilled in melee combat, from his initial appearances when he defeats Batman in a sword fight (nearly killing him), and others when he overwhelms Batman but declines to kill him.[141] He is talented with firearms, although even his guns are theatrical; his long-barreled revolver often releases a flag reading "Bang", and a second trigger-pull launches the flag to skewer its target.[134][142] Although formidable in combat, the Joker's chief asset is his mind.[100]" It is covered in the article, it is not something he is primarily known for nor is it consistent so it does not belong in the manner you added it.Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, but it's important to highlight his unpredictability (even for characters capable of predicting adversaries' moves, like Cassandra Cain) and his ability to use any object (like a pencil, a bird feather or a glass) as a weapon. And his ability as hand to hand combatant is not listed at the beginning in the "In-story information" section. Ales Mansay (talk) 20:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Because, as I just said, the Joker is not notable for combat ability. What he can and cannot do varies wildly from writer to writer, and his ability to hold things and hit things with them is not notable either. Elsewhere in the article, it says "The Joker's unpredictable, homicidal nature makes him one of the most feared supervillains in the DC Universe; the Trickster says in the 1995 miniseries Underworld Unleashed, "When super-villains want to scare each other, they tell Joker stories."[143][144]" and " Even with his unpredictability and lack of superhuman powers, the 2007 limited series Salvation Run sees hundreds of villains fall under his spell because they are more afraid of him than the alternative: Luthor.[148]" and "The Joker kills Alexander Luthor, Jr. in Infinite Crisis (2005) for excluding him from the Secret Society of Super Villains, which considers him too unpredictable for membership.[74][75]" His combat skills are mentioned the appropriate amount as are his relevant skills. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Can I at least list it at the beginning along with the other abilities of his? Ales Mansay (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

You don't need my permission to do anything. What I am expressing to you above is that the Joker being able to punch someone does not make it a notable skill. Adding "lethal combatant" is something you can add to anyone holding a gun. The Joker is not known for his combat skills, Batman is known for his combat skills. The Joker is known for his intelligence and weaponry, things that are already mentioned in the article in appropriate terms. So while you don't need my permission to do anything, I do not agree with your edit, and per WP:BRD, you should discuss it here before continuing to add that information, and since I completely disagree with you, we need other parties to become involved. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Joker is also known for being a lethal combatant with a personal combat style with also knowledge in martial arts (portrayed also in Batman:Arkham Asylum videogame and in Injustice and seen also, for example, in the comic book Salvation Run and The Joker: Devil's Advocate, Endgame and the story with Cassandra Cain and Joker first encounter, and of course in the animated movie Assault On Arkham and Death Of The Family, just to mention some), either with and without his weapons and gadgets. He phisically subdued and almost subdued many dangerous adversaries, even physically stronger than him, Batman himself admitted he's a dangerous combatant, with an unpredictable style and a "gibberish" body language, not to mention a superior agility and reflexes, this fact is reported on every wiki, I find very unfair not to mention it in the "In-story information" section, while even Two-Face's, Black Mask's and The Penguin's got that mention. Also his ability as marksman should be mentioned. Ales Mansay (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm rapidly losing the will to live. You're mentioning a lot of non-comic interpretations for a start while talking about an article on the comic version, and someone beating someone or hurting someone in a fight does not make them a skilled combatant. It makes them non-paralysed. I'm not interested in discussing this further with you because you're not grasping it. And per WP:OTHERSTUFF, other articles doing something doesn't make it the right thing. I haven't read the Penguin's article but if it says he is a skilled combatant on there, it needs removing because that's stupid. By this loose grasp of logic, every single comic character needs skilled combatant adding to their page because they've ever thrown a punch. EDIT: No his ability as a marksman should not be mentioned. This isn't a fan wikia. He's not Deadshot. Deadshot's marksman ability should be mentioned. Because the Joker can fire a gun he's a master marksman!? Yeah, I'm checking out of this discussion, go get a third opinion from someone. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The comic books I mentioned aren't enough? You're saying he didn't show to possess marksman abilities like Black Mask? The Penguin, with his skills in fencing, judo and boxe (whose training and fights has been even shown in comics) isn't to be considered a skilled combatant? I'm a real and long time expert of the topic, and I know and sure of what I say, with all due respect. Ales Mansay (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

You're not an expert, you're a person who consumes media. Experts write books on topics, they don't argue someone is something because they did something minor related to the subject one time. You're telling me that short, fat Penguin, who uses goons for everything is an expert combatant because of an unsourced paragraph on Wikipedia. Again, I'm happy to wait for a third opinion, because I believe you are wrong. And no, you repeating that Cassandra Cain struggled with him one time because he is so wildly unpredictable is not evidence that one of the Joker's most well known traits is that he is a master of the martial arts. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 00:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

First, I don't simply "consume media", I study it and pop-culture, I consider myself also an enthusiast. Second, Joker showed skills in martial arts in the aforementioned Salvation Run and also against Harley Quinn and many pop-culture sites report of his personal and invented combat style he used even against Batman and the rest of the Bat-Family and various villains. Third, The Penguin was shown to fight also with bare hands (literally) various times, even against Batman and not only thugs. Fourth, I don't like at all being treated like a clueless ignorant, I'm not wrong, I know what I say. Fifth, what's the problem in mentioning Joker's hand-to-hand combat skills (it's to remember that this always dedended on the authors of the stories) in the "In-story information" section at the beginning like has been done for the other villain characters I aforementioned since it's already reported in the "Characterization" section? I don't see the problem, this doesn't make sense. Ales Mansay (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

And it's not that the only problem, there are other skills and abilities that are missing in that section. Should be like this:

• Criminal mastermind
• Expert chemist
• Uses weaponized props and toxins
• Expert and unpredictable tactician
• Formidable agility and reflexes (superior than Batman's)
• Skilled hand-to-hand combatant
• Inhuman resistance to pain
• Immunity to toxins and poisons
• Expert in explosives
• Indomitable will Ales Mansay (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I said it needs a third party to enter the discussion, not just throw all that crap in while we wait. WP: STATUSQUO and WP:BRD, read the policies. Inhuman resistance to pain is not a power or a skill, indominitable will? This is firstly about the comics character and no other interpretations in other media, or loose claims he has a certain ability because he trades punches with Batman when its dramatic. It is not a Wikia.Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Those are abilities and skills mainly from the comic character, I put even sources, I would not put something taken from other media, I'm getting tired, and his will is really indomitable and it's a fact, even The Spectre and Martian Manhunter failed to control or to read his mind. I know everything and I'm well informed on the character, it's not "crap" (I don't think this language is "appropriate" here, and I don't like it at all), I report only facts and it's a real shame that there is this insistence to restrict and to keep other users from writing them, while there are other similar pages on other characters that report these facts. Why keep doing this? Why should there need a third party? Why this insistence and restriction? I don't understand where is the problem here. Ales Mansay (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

A third party is needed because we disagree and since we can't come to an agreement, a third opinion is required. The infobox is for notable powers. The Joker is not known as a master combatant or for an indomintable will, not should wildly inconsistent portrayals mean that any time the Joker does something, i.e. uses a gun, should he be called a master marksman. As I have already mentioned and per WP:OTHERSTUFF, other articles doing stuff is not an excuse. The stuff you keep mentioning isn't even sourced IN THOSE articles, and the vast majority of comic related articles on Wikipedia are of a low quality because a) few people care to work on characters like the Penguin, and b) it's difficult to source things. The two CBR sources you used are written as jokes for the most part. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 17:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Shouldn't be listed at least in the In-story section his formidable agility and reflexes, proven and stated to be superior than Batman's? It's one of his most famous characteristics and abilities. I don't see it in the characterization section either. Also his ability as unpredictable tactician, his knowledge of explosives and also his knowledge of psychology and manipulation of others should be listed. Plus, in the characterization section should be written that is impossible to control or read his chaotic mind and to negotiate with him. Can we agree on this? Ales Mansay (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The Joker isn't known for his fighting abilities, although he sometimes displays them. This should not be mentioned in the infobox or the lead. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I quoted three sections above where it mentions he is unpredictable. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 14:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Joker actors

Why is Jared Leto not mentioned as a previous actor for this role? Redheadmonroe (talk) 05:35, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

It was the result of a discussion that we can't endlessly list every actor who plays the Joker because there are several and that's before getting into voice actors, so we list the most prominent, and the 3 up there are all acclaimed in their own ways. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 10:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Jared Leto

With Zack Snyder's Justice League, Jared Leto will be the first Joker film actor to play the character twice. Should he be mentioned in the start? TokoChihiro (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

What kind of artificial achievement is that? Played a character twice. If you look up the previous discussions, to avoid an endless list of actors, we've gone with the ones that have received significant individual recognition for the roles. It's either limit it, or none at all. Leto appeared in one derided role and is appearing in a remix of an existing film in a capacity we are not aware of. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 17:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2021

should we mention that the joker is good at fighting in the "abilities" section? the article mentioned this in the "skills and equipment" section, even with a cited source, so would it be ok to say that hes a good hand-to-hand combatant? 2600:6C51:7C7E:F5D3:F8E6:FB02:3E26:A81F (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Not done Please format all edit requests in a clear "Change X to Y" style and be as specific as possible what you want to be changed. In this request it's not clear what change is desired to be made. (t · c) buidhe 00:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The Joker's real name has never been revealed in DC comics

Can The joker be added in the category of fictional characters without a name.The only thing known about The Joker's past that is he was once the The Red Hood.Jack1578 (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your suggestion.Dimadick (talk) 20:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

“THE” Joker

The Joker’s has a the United the beginning. It’s not just Joker. Jdietr601 (talk) 03:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

"Stop right there, The Joker!". It's been discussed in the past, search the archives for it, his name is Joker. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 11:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

So where are the archives? Jdietr601 (talk) 19:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Right hand side of the page. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 19:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I’m on mobile though Jdietr601 (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Also according to the Batman wiki it has a The in the beginning. Jdietr601 (talk) 00:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Bill Finger's Estate and DC

The page is so well written I thought it better to leave a comment and for someone else more versed in Joker to decide if this is relevant. In 2015 Finger's heirs and DC came to an agreement in connection with Finger's creative input and began crediting him going forward. The DC press release however states that it "recognizes Mr. Finger’s significant contributions to the Batman family of characters." and does not name Joker specifically. Not sure if this information should be included on this page. Asr1014 (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

References

Infobox image

I'm sorry if this has been discussed before, but I just wanted to say that I'm not terribly keen on the current infobox image. Not that it's bad or anything, but I have some issues with it. For one, it doesn't depict the Joker in his traditional and most recognizable outfit (purple suit with yellow/green clothes). And second, while Alex Ross is a fantastic artist, he's known for having a very distinct style—which is one of the last things we want when the infobox image is supposed to be the best, most recognizable representation of the character in question. It's also not in the traditional line art of comic books.

I'd personally suggest an image more like this. JOEBRO64 14:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• I haven't read it, but maybe an image from Batman: Three Jokers would be appropriate? Didn't that series feature the 3 most common versions of Joker? Argento Surfer (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
• This is probably the best clean image I've found via Moda
• There are things like this but I think the infobox would smush it down so it'd look terrible.
• A plain old Joker image here
• and another here though I'm not a fan of the face art, personal taste. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
  • @Darkwarriorblake and Argento Surfer: I think that Three Jokers cover with the, well, three Jokers would work pretty well, with a caption saying something across the lines of "Cover of Three Jokers, depicting (clockwise from bottom) the Golden Age, Silver Age, and Modern Age incarnations of the Joker". We could also crop it a bit so Batman's hands aren't as visible (though I don't think that's totally necessary). JOEBRO64 18:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
    • I think the hands holding the card is pretty fitting and the card depicts his symbol as well. Like 4 birds with one stone. I don't think Golden Age and Silver Age are appropriate though since they mean nothing to a casual reader. Something like original and modern incarnations would do, but I can't think of one for the intermediary version. Could just say "depicting the major incarnations of the Joker character from original (bottom) to modern (top). Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Other Versions: Earth 2

Under Other versions there should be a reference to the Earth 2 Joker who appeared as a villian against the Huntress and the Earth-2 Robin. In this version, he had a tooth missing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.90.195.197 (talk) 04:10, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2021

Add on Reception: Guinness World Records Gamer's Edition listed The Joker as third in their list of "top 50 video game villains". 142.247.97.188 (talk) 04:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

No such section exists. I have no issue adding to another section, but you'll need to specify which sections and exactly where in the article. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

This article is about the comic character so it wouldn't belong here either way, it'd go in the Other Versions article or a respective game article. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 12:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

References

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2021

remove ref 138 WhatCulture source as its one of the unreliable source out there. 211.51.230.187 (talk) 07:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done for now: Please provide a replacement source for where it's used. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 8 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is no consensus for a move at this time. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 03:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

---

Joker (character) → Joker (DC Comics) – The existence of Joker (Mass Effect) and Joker (Persona) make the current disambiguation insufficient to separate the comic book character from others. Even if the comic character is more popular overall, I am not aware of a policy to leave a disambiguation purposely vague for that reason. Once something is disambiguated, it should be fully disambiguated. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose per previous discussions, and this is far and away the primary topic for characters named "Joker". JOEBRO64 00:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

  Since there's no template at the top, and for the benefit of those who might want to read up:

31 October 2012: Joker (comics) → The Joker; not moved

10 November 2014: Joker (comics) → Joker (character); not moved

12 May 2015: Joker (comics) → The Joker (character); no consensus

17 April 2017: Joker (comics) → Joker (character); moved

5 April 2018: Joker (character) → The Joker; not moved

14 April 2018: Joker (character) → Joker (DC Comics); not moved

25 April 2018: Joker (character) → Joker (DC Comics character); not moved

162 etc. (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

As stated in the rationale, the circumstances have changed since 2018 - two notable articles on OTHER characters named Joker have since been created. Also as stated, there is no "primary topic" for disambiguated subtopics. Something is either the overall primary topic, or there is no primary topic at all. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Right, I was posting that as a comment. As for the request itself, it seems to make sense, but I'll hold my vote for now. Somebody might be able to find some comparables that we can use as an example? I found Toad (comics) and Toad (Nintendo) - per WP:NCCDAB, the former should actually be at Toad (character), but then we have the same incomplete disambiguation problem. There was also this RM, where a proposal to move Wrath (comics) to Wrath (character) didn't find consensus, again based on possible ambiguity, this time with Wrath (wrestler). 162 etc. (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Are you seriously arguing that two video game characters who appeared in like three video games apiece are just as notable as the Joker? The page views alone clearly show that this is far and away the primary topic for characters named Joker. See the recent consensus to move Venom (Marvel Comics character) to Venom (character)—INCOMPLETEDAB can be overridden if it's clear that a character is overwhelmingly the primary topic. If a reader comes here looking for a different Joker, they can click the hatnote. JOEBRO64 12:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm definitely not arguing that they are "just as notable as the Joker", thanks for the WP:STRAWMAN though. My argument is that they are notable enough that the Joker is not the obvious primary topic. And, again, there is no other character simply called "Venom" that is not related to the Marvel one. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose per Joe and WP:INCDAB, which says Usually, a qualified title that is still ambiguous has no primary topic and In individual cases consensus may determine that a parenthetically disambiguated title that is still ambiguous has a primary topic. This is one of those unusual cases. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

This does not in fact seem like one of those cases, as there would be no use to the reader if this was not fully disambiguated. It would simply result in WP:SURPRISE and confusion if they were searching for Persona's Joker to arrive at this article, which is not clearly marked as not being it. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Well, that's just like, your opinion and stuff. My opinion is the opposite. Page views for the Persona character are 10k in the last 30 days. Page views for the comic character are 110k in the last 30 days. If you assume that every one of the page views for Persona accidentally came here first and subtract them from the comic character's total, that means the comic character still gets 100x as many hits. I don't know what your personal threshold for not requiring complete DAB is, but mine lower than 100x more popular. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

To add to this, the comic character averages 3,715 page views per day. The Persona character averages 341 views per day. The Mass Effect character? One view per day. JOEBRO64 16:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

That's still 10k people being WP:SURPRISED by the wrong title which would be tremendous by the standards of almost any other Wikipedia article. And 10k people is a pretty massive amount of pageviews in itself. We shouldn't let it get distorted by the outsize pageviews of the Joker's article. It should be relative to other articles on Wikipedia, not relative to the Joker's popularity. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Have you read that SURPRISED link? The bulk of it is about article content, not article titles. When it does talk about article titles, it's in reference to using hatnotes, not disambiguation. This article has a hatnote already, so SURPRISED doesn't apply. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

As an added date point, the comic article has 1514 incoming links from article space. The Persona article has 163. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose per Argento Surfer. There is no doubt this is the primary topic for all Joker characters. Calidum 17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose. The DC Comics supervillain is much more established in popular culture, not least by predating the others by over half a century. JIP | Talk 17:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose an excellent example of when a topic is the primary topic for partial disambiguation. A hatnote to the DAB is sufficient for other characters. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 17:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support per nomination. Joker (character) is incomplete disambiguation and should redirect to the Joker#Fictional characters disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose. Clearly the most important and primary character of this name, and this is one of those occasions when a partially disambiguated title is fine.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This oscar thing with Vito Corleone

Can we get an agreement here going forward about this? Is this an actual accomplishment or not? Character existing and being nominated for or winning awards with different actors seems, to me, like a made up achievement. Nothing has happened to make this exist beyond the characters being re-used or re-cast. It also, IMO, gives WP:UNDUE weight to oscar awards. You could probably include "joker has appeared on IGN's best villains list like 20 times, what an achievement?" Anyway, I'd like others opinions so we can get a proper stance on this to either include it or have a discussion we can point to when people keep adding it. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 18:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposal to replace the main image per WP:FREER

WP:FREER states that fair-use images should only be used when there are no creative commons or public domain alternatives. Wikimedia Commons has multiple public domain images of the Joker portrayed by Cesar Romero, such as File:Cesar Romero - The Joker 1967.jpg and File:Bat risas figurita 51.jpg. This means that there are clearly free alternatives to accurately illustrate the character, so File:Batman Three Jokers.jpg should be removed and replaced to comply with Wikipedia policy. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: You reverted the edit for the reason that "this article isn't about the 1960s series Joker". However, they are the same character. The depiction in one series is not a separate character from the others. In fact, the 1960s version is just the "Golden Age" version, which the article does have a section about. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

This is a bizarre thought process, the comic character is the original, anything else is derivative. THe discussion of the "Golden Age" Joker relates to his comic incarnations pretty obviously. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 09:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Pretty much what DWB said. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 13:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Can we find a image that isn't three friggin jokers? LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Can you provide reasoning why one image that covers the major incarnations of Joker isn't better? Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 14:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

While it covers the "major incarnations" to some extent, it only shows a limited snapshot of the actual portrayals of the character in each era. "modern era" joker covers everything from the comics to the animated series to heath ledger to whatever they did with joker in suicide squad. I think just choosing a single image of like golden era or silver era comic book joker would be easier, clearer, and more NPOV, with a caption that says "joker as depicted in XXXX" LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2023

"Finger produced an image of actor Conrad Veidt in character as Gwynplaine" -> "Finger used an image of actor Conrad Veidt as Gwynplaine." Rationale: Finger did not produce the photo. He just happened to have the photo of Gwynplaine. Also, "in character" is not needed here. The context is quite clear. 2600:6C44:117F:95BE:485B:151D:5673:182B (talk) 07:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)