Talk:John Michael Greer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Michael Greer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

notability and self promotion

This article seems to be designed solely as self promotion by the subject. First, the editor who created this page stopped adding anything to Wikipedia six years ago - soon after this page was created - and two other articles started by this editor were deleted. Second, there are no sources except two anonymous websites, and another which no longer exists. Third, it has a long bibliography but no page numbers, so it amounts to a list of books about druidism rather than Mr. Greer, and thus a bibliography which is unconnected to the subject. Fourth, the article gives a list of the Greer's podcasts and websites. Finally, people do not get Wikipedia articles just because they have a blog, or give themselves non-titles like "cultural critic" or "historian of ideas." I would propose the article for deletion but I suspect Mr. Greer himself, or persons connected to this celebrity wannabe, would swoop down to object.Catherinejarvis (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Greer cares to be a celebrity, whatever that means. I recognize he is one of the notable voices in the "peak oil" movement (as the template shows), and deserves a basic neutral bio for that alone. In actual content, I agree the current bio is just promotion and the links and books ought to be severely pruned, but I'll leave that to people who like to cut things, and have clearer ideas than me for what belongs in proper bios. Tom Ruen (talk) 22:57, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is notable, but where in this article are the basic facts of his biography? Where was he educated? Where has he been employed, or self-employed? How have his writings been received by the 'mainstream' world? What of his contributions to gardening? Some of these questions are answered here, http://aoda.org/grove_bios.html -- subject to corroboration, of course, through some more objective source(s). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.115.38 (talk) 03:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cursory check seems to indicate that the books in the list with blue-linked ISBNs are authored or edited by John M. Greer, so he is at least a fairly prolific writer. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 212.95.237.92 (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second deletion effort

This article has already been deleted once, based on the subject's lack of notability, but has apparently been restored as if the reasons for deletion did not exist. This article is simply self promotion, a puff piece in which Greer uses his own sources as citations. The Druid website, for example, showing him a grand master or grand wizard or whatever title he gives himself. The use of meaningless words like "cultural critic" and "historian of ideas" further shows why this article should be deleted. Everyone on Earth could call themselves a cultural critic but they do not get Wikipedia pages.Catherinejarvis (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD nomination is incomplete. You need to create the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Michael Greer (second nomination) with your reasons for deletion. I'd recommend starting over and using Twinkle so that all the templates and notices get done automatically. You might also want to nominate cultural critic and history of ideas for deletion to if they are meaningless. Note that being a puff piece is not a valid reason for deletion, since it's surmountable if the criteria for WP:GNG are met. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only linked deletion discussion I could see, for the AfD notice that was recently removed, had a consensus to delete: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Michael Greer. Why is this here? Was it just recreated? I'm going to look more deeply at the history here, but unless someone can show a good reason why this was deleted I'm going to delete and consider salting. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was dated 2013. That's hardly "recent". If you would like to start a new AFD, no one will stop you. --Jayron 32 21:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Michael Greer has 49 published books to his name (according to Amazon, some may be repeats). I haven't read any but they appear to be substantial. He was also the head of a national religious organization until very recently and apparently has founded another. Apparently he is prominent in the national peak oil discussion. Sounds "notable" to me. And why should this article not include a complete bibliography -- that is the least I would expect if I were trying to find out about the man. Why should someone have to resort to Amazon? --Tom Yelton (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Michael Greer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304071523/http://www.wfs.org/J-F2010/Review%20Docksai.htm to http://www.wfs.org/J-F2010/Review%20Docksai.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing issues

There is going to have to be some cleanup as I'm seeing a lot of sourcing to blogs, which are not third-party, WP:RS sources. While it's acceptable to have some quotes from the subject themselves, this article right now is overly-reliant on non-RS sourcing. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 20:05, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meditation

Hello John Michael Greer. My name is Jason and I'm new to Facebook, but I have been a great admirer of yours for a long time! I was hoping you could give me some advice on meditation. I have recently begun studying Golden Dawn Hermetics and I was wanting to know if you think it is going to be a problem for me as I am unable to meditate very well... can I expect to be capable of making any real progress in GD magic with very limited meditation ability? 120.21.132.70 (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ask him on Magic Mondays 158.228.64.46 (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scholarly References are now being added

Hey all: I came upon this page after having been interested to scroll through the wikipedia page titled List of autodidacts. I did not find Greer in the list — and was very surprised because in this century his published books (not self-published) have been referenced by many bloggers who are well-known in the peak oil, overshoot, and societal collapse subject areas. I understand that wikipedia standards require journalistic and/or traditionally published book or journal article references, so I just started using google scholar to find some. Fortunately, my first search for Greer's well-known concept of "catabolic collapse" was referenced in a chapter by an academic philosopher of science in a scholarly book — and that scholar has a good wikipedia bio page: Jerome Ravetz. So that qualifies. And that was the small set of edits I made to this article today.

Personally, I don't have an interest in bringing this page up to wikipedia standards, especially not in doing any deletions in those vast lists of titles by Greer. After I made my edits today, I finally looked at this Talk page and was horrified by the vitriol of the person who tried twice to delete this bio page. This is exactly the reason why, while I feel I have important work to do in continuing to reputably improve the concept pages in which I am very knowledgeable (I am a published author, but an autodidact myself, while qualifying to be on Researchgate), I am really wary of doing anything on a bio page. I recently went into the bio page of Jem Bendell and updated it and made it fair. Bendell agreed with my edits, though he did not recruit me. I decided to do it myself because the concept page he is most known for, Deep Adaptation, led me to his bio page, which I then judged as needing improvement. Finally, I am so adverse to wikipedia bio pages of living persons, that when somebody tried to create one for me, I told him to remove it immediately. He did. I much prefer to have people "google" me to find all my published works that way. Cbarlow (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]