Jump to content

Talk:John F. Barrett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anna Louise Inn

[edit]

A vandal tried to delete the section about Barrett's company buying a womens' shelter and evicting its residents. An article verifying this can be found here: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BCA3:8720:39BF:6907:BFFF:10D3 (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign-in with a real user name. Your comments about Barrett and W&S are borderline libelous. MicheleYD (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is cited and accurate. The fact that you don't like Barrett and W&S being characterized as scumbags doesn't mean it isn't true - or libelous. Nice try. I'm assuming you work for the W&S legal team. Your money and power means nothing here. But, keep trying. I can do this forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkaplan73 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dkaplan73 has removed the links to the Anna Louise Inn page and persists in vandalizing the corporate page with his politicized views of a controversial topic. I did what multiple parties agreed to and created a separate ALI page for a balanced presentation of the facts. Instead of linking to that page, that user is destroying the content. This is vandalism, in my view. MicheleYD (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And once again undoing vandalism by User:Dkaplan73 who seems to believe that Western & Southern page is the Anna Louise inn page so he can deface it by posting a one-sided diatribe. Sorry, that's not the way Wikipedia works. MicheleYD (talk) 19:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Requested third opinion for both Barrett and Western Southern pages, which user Dkaplan73 believes are there to house one side (his side only) of the long, complex Anna Louise controversy. MicheleYD (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I replied at Talk:Western & Southern Financial Group, and I think the same response generally applies here. Let me emphasize, though, that it is critical to keep WP:BLP in mind, as well as the policy on assuming good faith. "Has been characterized as" is not an adequate qualifier to add pejorative descriptors that do not contribute to a fundamental understanding of the topic. VQuakr (talk) 04:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That helps clarify it. MicheleYD (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/women-sad-angry-over-sale-nonprofit-ohio-home-152229520.html

Power 100 info

[edit]

I'd like to add "and 2016" to the section "Business and community involvement" in this sentence:

...the most influential person in the Greater Cincinnati area by Cincy magazine in its annual Power 100 list (February 2009 and 2016)

Here is the Reference for this addition: http://cincymagazine.com/Main/Articles/4725.aspx

Thanks, AJR99 19:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)SheilaVeits — Preceding unsigned comment added by SheilaVeits (talk • contribs)

Could someone please add "and 2016" or grant me permission to add it? I am a PR professional. AJR99 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)SheilaVeits — Preceding unsigned comment added by SheilaVeits (talk • contribs) AJR99 19:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SheilaVeits (talk • contribs) [reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on John F. Barrett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John F. Barrett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:John_F._Barrett&oldid=1258055707"