Talk:James Laughlin Award

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of Awardees

I think there is little virtue to listing the titles of the winning volumes and the judges in this table. Where Wikipedia articles are available, the title of the winning volume should be listed there. I can't think of any particular reason for Wikipedia to archive the names of the judges; presumably these will be available at the Academy's website for interested readers. The virtue of eliminating these items is that it would make the table of awardees more usable. Easchiff (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the listing of judges is harmful, but I also don't think it's necessary, and, as usual, I will defer to editorial consensus. --Abd (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I compiled the list into a list of judges, placed at the bottom, reverted by an editor with the comment, (Undid revision 289742417 by Abd (talk) List of particular year's judges important to connection with winner. Talk before removal please.). As well as the above comment, this was being discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Poetry, and my edit was intended to mollify objections about copyvio, but I have no personal objection to either version, as noted above. Now my snit: hmmpph! Perhaps you should explain a revert in Talk! Please do realize that until I edited the page, it was a redirect, all the content was invisible to ordinary mortals. (Well, to readers who don't know to notice and follow a redirect back to the original page.) Now, back to our regular programming. --Abd (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the awardees from 1954-1975 in the condensed format (no volume title, no judges). I'm not sure there's too much value in adding the titles & judges, but I won't object if someone chooses to do it. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lamont Poetry Selection: publication as part of the selection?

A previous editor, Abd perhaps, added a hidden note asking whether books of poetry were published by the Academy as part of the Lamont Poetry Selection process. I don't think this is the case; I believe I read somewhere that the Academy accepted nominations of volumes under contract to publishers, but not actually in print. On the other hand, the Walt Whitman Prize specifically includes publication of the first volume by Louisiana State University Press; it supplanted the original Lamont's role as a first-volume prize in 1975, when the Lamont switched to being a 2nd volume selection. Easchiff (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of winners of the James Laughlin Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081216173141/http://www.boisestate.edu/english/ahsahta/books/morrison/morrison.htm to http://www.boisestate.edu/english/ahsahta/books/morrison/morrison.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]