Talk:James Dreyfus

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gay or not?

There seems to be some controversy about this. I can't find an answer, but I've found an article (Lesbians, bisexuals, gay men and transgendered people) that cites two publications with differing beliefs:

Yet, at the same time, famous lesbigays are still frightened of, or extremely cautious about, coming out - for example, according to Terry Sanderson [1999]:

“... there was the case of James Dreyfus [sic]*, who is ... making a tidy living out of playing the Nancy, firstly as PC Goodie in The Thin Blue Line and, more recently, in Gimme, Gimme, Gimme on BBC2. Over at Elle magazine, he was described as ‘the straight-in-real-life actor’. Could it possibly be the same James Dreyfus who gave a coming-out interview a week earlier in the Pink Paper? ...” (p59).

* Not sure what this 'sic' is for.

Perhaps we should delete the statement until we can cite some evidence one way or another. Grant 22:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Dreyfus is as gay as Sean Hayes: just neither will admit it. No explicit statements exists for either, though most of their work has been playing gay men. Dev920 18:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA! EVIDENCE HAS BEEN FOUND! http://www.rainbownetwork.com/Health/detail.asp?iData=22798&iCat=173&iChannel=16&nChannel=Health Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thermoman

The character name changed from George Sunday to George Monday when Dreyfus started playing the part. See IMDB for evidence.—Ashleyvh (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section

This whole section appears to be WP:UNDUE and unbalanced according to WP:BLP. I would’ve thought ChiveFungi and KalHolmann would be a bit more careful, considering they were both instrumental in other editors being recently sanctioned for POV pushing.81.108.118.166 (talk) 09:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many biographies have extensive "personal life" sections, or whole sections dedicated to the subject's political views (even if their main occupation is not politician or activist). If you google his name, this is the only real news about him from the past year. If he had been very active recently and this was just one of many notable things he'd done - maybe it would be undue. And KalHolmann has done a great job rewriting the paragraph to use the petition's own words to describe it - so it can hardly be said that the paragraph is unfairly cherry-picking descriptors from negative sources. --ChiveFungi (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this Personal Life section, which is just a Controversies section by another name, smacks of WP:RECENT. How is him recently signing a petition notable, except that it is a petition in opposition to a group you share a POV with? BLPs MUST comply with WP:NPOV.81.108.118.166 (talk) 15:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Ridiculous UNDUE. 82.28.201.216 (talk) 22:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Petition

There has been reverting since early October regarding the petition, so I've added full protection, in the first instance for three days. Those wanting to include the information should gather up mainstream, independent, high-quality secondary sources (no primary sources, no highly partisan sources, no tabloid journalism) that discuss his signing the petition to establish whether WP:DUE is satisfied. If that secondary coverage exists, consensus should be sought here on talk, or on WP:BLPN, regarding how to summarize it. Many thanks, SarahSV ^(talk) 23:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Openly gay

Dreyfus has frequently mentioned his sexuality on his Twitter account. Should probably be mentioned? Rqe1 (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns

There seems to be an edit war going regarding pronouns that violates NPOV. On 29th January 2021 the human formerly known as James Dreyfus stated categorically that that human "does not use pronouns". Now, that human may be an idiot that doesn't know what a pronoun is, but we must respect that human's choices. I therefore, in compliance with that human's choices, removed that human's pronouns and replaced them with neutral equivalents. It seems there are some users on Wikipedia that are determined to cause trouble and not respect that human's choices, and keep reverting the changes to re-enforce their own preference for that human's pronouns, in total violation of NPOV. Please stop this.

This is no more than a petty point scoring exercise, being celebrated and boasted about by multiple persons on Twitter. Until such time as reliable sources (not a Pink News piece based on a Tweet) actually reports on this, there is no reason not to continue to keep the WP:STATUSQUO version of the article. This behaviour is disruptive editing, and not appropriate for Wikipedia. AutumnKing (talk) 13:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: "I don't want to reflect the facts, I want to enforce my opinion." — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiPhu (talk • contribs) 15:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If facts were being provided there would be no issue. Please refrain from attempting to make personal attacks. Content needs to adhere to Wikipedia policies, and be based on a reliable sources. That is not an opinion but a fact. Interpreting information to suit a particular version is WP:OR. AutumnKing (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A WP:RS must be provided to justify the removal of pronouns. His twitter account, citing a statement which is likely being misinterpreted (he appears to have been referring to the fact that he doesn't put pronouns in his twitter bio, not that he doesn't want to be called 'he/him') is not a Reliable Source. Lilipo25 (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That human said that human doesn't use pronouns, and somehow that's not a reliable source. This is why Wikipedia editors irritate me. The disconnect between reality and statement is alarming, all to maintain a biased position. Shocking. Oh, and that wasn't a personal attack. It was an attack on a policy. Don't try and paint this as otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiPhu (talk • contribs) 18:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't about Wikipedia "editors" (which is a personal statement), it is about Wikipedia policy. Reliable sources are required for such major changes in a WP:BLP, and a twitter remark that you appear to have misunderstood is not a WP:RS. There really is no other argument to be made. Your changes do not adhere to the rules. Lilipo25 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone makes a statement that A is B, and you say I've "misunderstood it". Wow. Thanks for proving my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiPhu (talk • contribs) 21:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected this page to stop disruption. The page may be changed if a policy-based consensus determines that it should, but reliable and clearly understandable sourcing about the subject's preference will be needed. GirthSummit _(blether) 19:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protect article

Lots of vandalism recently regarding his views on the aggressive trans issue… methinks time to permanently protect this article? 91.125.10.93 (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]