User talk:WikiPhu

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, WikiPhu. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Trevj (talk • contribs) 15:00, 9 March 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 11:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from being an ignorant and patronising git. I do not need to "experiment in the sandbox". The edits were a reflection of truth, not vandalism. If you think reporting the fact that the United States is now being run by a fascist dictator is "vandalism" then you do not deserve an internet connection, let alone editing privileges.

WikiPhu ~ Please refrain from making personal attacks on other editors~ regards ~mitch~ (talk) 11:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And of the editor telling me that I should "experiment in the sandbox"? Calling my edits vandalism because they don't like them? Double standards.

June 2022

Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kay Burley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not the place for banging your favourite drum. Unless you can find a reliable secondary source saying that Kay Burley is transphobic, it's time to drop it.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 20:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SHE TWEETED IN SUPPORT OF TRANSPHOBIA YOU IGNORANT PATRONISING WP:NPOV VIOLATING IGNORAMUS.

Wikipedia is not the place to hide the facts of transphobia. Unless you can justify you why transphobia should be hidden from the public to serve your personal agenda, it's time to drop it. WikiPhu (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop patronising me.

Please stop violating WP:NPOV.

Please stop erasing transphobia.

If you would like to do any of these things, please use the sandbox, and stop being a patronising arse. And before anyone comes along and says "please refrain from personal attacks" - get bent. Patronising me and hiding transphobia is a personal attack, so you damn well started it. WikiPhu (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

God I hate patronising editors on Wikipedia who think the sun shines out of their backsides and can force their worldview on the world by saying "it's not neutral to tell the truth! You have to be neutral!". Get bent. Kay Burley is a contributor to a global pandemic of transphobia and hate speech, and YOU'RE. HELPING. IT. ALONG.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent personal attacks, battleground attitude and apparent inability to communicate civilly.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you editors really love to dish it out but hate to receive it huh?

You pushed a hate speech agenda, and now my account is locked.

The account ‪WikiPhu‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Ponyo‬ for the following reason(s):

Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: specifically "treating editing as a battleground" and "major or irreconcilable conflict of attitude or intention"

Well.. what a f*cking surprise. Wikipedia editors prove themselves to be a bunch of arrogant a*holes, once again.

"Treating editing as a battleground"

I'M SORRY - I DIDN'T REALISE STATING THE TRUTH WAS A BATTELGROUND THESE DAYS YOU BIASED HATE SPEECH SUPPROTING F*CKS.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiPhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Editors ianmacm and Martinevans123 instigated personal attacks on me by being patronising and removing factual edits because the edits disagreed with their personal agendas. WikiPhu (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's quite enough. You were blocked for personal attacks, and you're continuing them here. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh... and in case you're wondering why I'm not being "civil" - oh that might be because you're attacking me and supporting hate speech. Sorry, but I don't find that something that I should be civil towards. You sort your problems out, I'll sort mine. Welcome to the world. There are consequences for bad actions, and you got them.