Talk:Jaisalmer Fort

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Fortifications / Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jaisalmer Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding gallery

@Yamaguchi先生: Hey! You seem to be removing the image gallery for some reason. Can you explain why you think the gallery of images is indiscriminate? IMO the images should be left alone, wanted to ask why you feel like it doesn't fit in the article. --ShellPandey (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShellPandey, thank you for the ping. There are currently 5 images placed adjacent to the article text, 1 additional in the infobox, plus 12 images presented in a gallery format. Generally speaking, Wikipedia is not an image repository (WP:NOTGALLERY), and galleries should not be used as a device to shoehorn images into an article. Some of these images are repetitive and provide little in the way of context. Would it not be feasible to relocate surplus images to Commons repository, where it would make sense to present these same images? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]