Jump to content

Talk:Island bronze-naped pigeon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Island bronze-naped pigeon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Comments:

  • An explanation of what "moderately quick decline" means would be nice.
    • Just what it sounds like, a decline that is moderately quick. The IUCN assessment doesn't have any estimates or anything, so nothing else I can do but quite them.
  • Is there anywhere you can link "shade forest" to?
    • Can't find a suitable target article.
  • ...hunting pressure on the pigeon may be increasing as a substantial number of young children are involved in hunting. Why does young children being involved mean that the pressure is increasing?
    • Just realized that the IUCN assessment doesn't make this claim, reworded to "may be increasing and a substantial number of young children".
  • Range map, please?
    • Added.
  • Why is no average weight range given?
    • No measurements.
  • Are male and females sexually dimorphic in terms of size, or just coloring?
    • Just coloring.

Birb :) [are tasty] Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SilverTiger12, see responses above. AryKun (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm passing this article now. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 01:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the island bronze-naped pigeon is a popular food at bars and parties on São Tomé? Source: BirdLife International (2021). "Columba malherbii". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2021: e.T22690351A176745675. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-3.RLTS.T22690351A176745675.en
    Carvalho, Mariana Bastos (2014). Hunting and conservation of forest pigeons in São Tomé (PDF). Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa. pp. 148, 151.

Improved to Good Article status by AryKun (talk). Self-nominated at 14:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Island bronze-naped pigeon; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Recently promoted to Good Article, so new enough. Also long enough and well-written, within policy. QPQ has been done, there is no image. The hook is good, and supported by a reliable, inline citation. It should be good to go without further changes. Nice article! Yakikaki (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]