Talk:Immersed tube

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology Start‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Sabotage - OR, not evidence

The assertion that immersed tubes are more susceptible to sabotage or terrorist attack has been in the article, without citation, since 18 September 2005. It's had a citation-needed template on it since 20 September 2008, more than two years ago. That's five years too long for such a tall claim to go so entirely unevidenced; it sure seems like someone's supposition. It may well be true, and I'm not saying that it's not, but for such a claim to stand we need real hard evidence, not original research, deduction, or supposition. We'd need to show that such a sabotage had actually happened, that the commissioners, designer, and builders of immersed tube systems had considered this eventuality, or that serious civil engineers had examined this and found that it was a credible threat. I'm going to remove it (and I feel guilty for not having done so in 2008) and it shouldn't be restored without adequate reliable sources. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 17:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Building the Marmaray tunnel.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Building the Marmaray tunnel.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Building the Marmaray tunnel.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrosion / expected life

How is corrosion dealt with, how long do we expect such tubes to last ? Aesma (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing examples

We don't need a list of everybody's favorite immersed tube. We don't need an invitation to expand the list either. There are far to many of them. We have categories for that. I'll make sure that the examples are in Category:Immersed tube tunnels (currently almost empty), with subcategories for countries that have more than one of them, and then remove the example list except for some very notable ones. PiusImpavidus (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're rehashing an old discussion regarding lists vs categories, and lists are allowable. I would suggest creating an article called List of immersed tube tunnels. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the size/length of the article, I would consider there to be room to keep the list here. However, if the list is returned, it should be done as a table where the reader can sort by year built or such Without sorting abilities, a bulleted list is no better than a category. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 07:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Immersed tube. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080512001517/http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/background/casting.html to http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/background/casting.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First immersed tunnel?

Was Michigan Central Railway Tunnel really the first immersed tunnel? Wasn't the Paris metro tunnel under the river Seine built earlier? The Seine metro tunnel was also built as a so called "sink tunnel". 212.100.101.104 (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]