Talk:Hypermodernism (art)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Additions I made Hello, I added the musician Otto Von Schirach and the aritst group FriendsWithYou because they meet the description given by your definition of hypermodernism. I believe closer inspection of these two artists for yourself will verify this. -anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.40.197 (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hypermodernism (art). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A wind-up?

This reads like gibberish and has no references. Is it for real? 78.150.177.38 (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, there are any number of legitimate art movements descriptions of which are characterized by what reads like gibberish. There is a single source listed in the Bibliography, but no inline citations. I have been too complacent about this article for some time now, and have begun checking the references. So far, very little of it stands up to scrutiny. Thank you for calling attention to this.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or condense and fold into Hypermodernity?

It seems like this is a really low quality garbled mess of an article mainly built by a single user with a history of questionable, citationless contributions to Wikipedia. Any relevant points within are already covered in a far superior way under Hypermodernity, so there doesn't really seem to be a good reason to keep this page around. GoodBoy69 (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]