Talk:Hydrogen infrastructure

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hydrogen infrastructure article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Climate change

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proven, really?

How can this technology be proven when the supporting source is taken from a DOE workshop? There's also no mention of "appropriate technology" or safety concerns about the use of hydrogen infrastructure. I don't think you can call a technology proven until it's widespread use with little to no incidents-- also with all things potentially going into practical utility use, there's little to no mention anywhere about the impacts on development and right-of-way. Bad encyclopedic form like this lends the "facts" in there articles to be abused and propagated clouding the real rational debate behind topics such as this.

This article smells of original research and unverified claims by a futurist or a design engineer. It's already pretty much been proven in an urban planning and real estate development outlook that hydrogen infrastructure is completely inappropriate in development densities past 2 development units per acre. Primarily due to leaks and 'pooling' of hydrogen but also due to mitigating concerns over the caustic nature of hydrogen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.199.52 (talk) 19:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any references for your statements ? in the meantime read reference 7 on Hydrogen station.Mion (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Low-content article, replace with disambiguation page

This article is simply average glosses on Hydrogen pipeline transport, Hydrogen highway, and Hydrogen station, with mention of alternative ways of fueling the latter. (Plus some undated blurbage about how awesome South Carolina's plans are.) I don't know all that WP:acronym terminology, but why not just replace with a disambiguation page that links to those three articles? -- Skierpage (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Skierpage Glad to see you are still active - hope you can comment on merger proposal at bottom of this page Chidgk1 (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are explosions in stations common?

Any kind of "explosions" in these (or other infrastructure)?

There was one this week (but I was WRONG, it was a methane station,[1] and "pressure explosion", no ignition, I'm told; a tourist was putting methane on a non-methane container) in one station (there are I believe a few, but only(?) one station for hydrogen) in Iceland (it was misused.. nobody died..). comp.arch (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hydrogen infrastructure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydrogen infrastructure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210131141/http://www.leightyfoundation.org/files/WHEC16-Lyon/WHEC16-Ref022.pdf to http://www.leightyfoundation.org/files/WHEC16-Lyon/WHEC16-Ref022.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogen fuel infrastructure

There's no end of material that could be written about hydrogen infrastructure in the large, even if the hydrogen highway never materializes at scale.

Probably this is a bigger topic at the end of the day than one can reasonable shoehorn into hydrogen economy.

This article presently fixates on hydrogen filling-station infrastructure, almost entirely targeted at civilian road transport.

As a comment from long ago points out, this article as it stands isn't much of a value add to other overlapping pages.

My vote: either broaden the focus, or collapse the tent. — MaxEnt 18:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxEnt I would welcome your opinion below Chidgk1 (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge sub-topics into here

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Hydrogen pipeline transport, Hydrogen highway, Hydrogen tank and Hydrogen station into here as I think none of those are worthy of their own articles. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative I proposed was to make this a disambiguation page. Either is better than the current duplication. Hydrogen tank and Hydrogen station have a bit more information, but I think you could pull them all together (which would leave just one page to watch for unwarranted boosterism and puffery from Hydrogen Economy™ hypers ;-) ). Why not Underground hydrogen storage as well? -- Skierpage (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a fairly long Hydrogen storage article so maybe Underground hydrogen storage should be merged into there rather than here Chidgk1 (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.