Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Raymond (1989)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Raymond (1989) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Raymond (1989) is part of the 1989 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 1, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 30, 2010Good topic candidateNot promoted
July 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Raymond (1989)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

For the most part, this article has everything the project demands for GA. The writing is quite good. However, I see two issues. The first has to do with Raymond's path within the United States. The article states that the low moved into Illinois, while the reference used mentioned that the surface low dissipated in New Mexico, with its remnant circulation aloft tracking through the Midwest. The text in the article needs to correspond with reference 12. Otherwise, it's missing the standard line about the name Raymond not being retired, and when the name was used in the future. Once these issues are fixed, I'll pass the article. Reviewer: Thegreatdr (talk) 19:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julian has resolved the first issue. The second issue needs to be addressed for GA passage. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late response but I've addressed the other issue with the lack of retirement now. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:38, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I'm passing the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]