Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Pauline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Pauline has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
June 28, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
January 29, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 7, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
September 8, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
January 21, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
August 17, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Todo

[edit]

More impact, better intro, more sources, inline sources. Jdorje 21:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. What more needs to be done? Hurricanehink 15:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Impact pictures. Not sure if they are allowed or not (no copyright notice).

Hurricanehink 17:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. As for the pictures, if there's no copyright notice we can't use them AFAIK. Jdorje 21:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and damn ;) Hopefully some pics will turn up somewhere. Hurricanehink 22:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA nom has failed

[edit]

The Good article nomination for Hurricane Pauline has failed for the following reason:

The article is a bit short. -- King of Hearts talk 03:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath

[edit]

There should be an aftermath section. Retirement and some of the current impact section should be put there, and I'm sure more info can be found. — jdorje (talk) 03:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

[edit]

Here's a few links to help with the article's expansion:

These are mostly for me, but if someone else wants to chip along, well, I'd be very happy. :) Titoxd(?!?) 03:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


GA Nomination June 2006 (declined)

[edit]

I've reviewed a number of these Hurricane articles now , this isnt there yet in the overall prose. Another concern is this paragrapgh

In Oaxaca, Hurricane Pauline killed 15 people, with 22 missing. [5] Pauline destroyed thousands of acres of crops, destroyed thousands of cattle, and killed many in the province. [6] International aid focused on the wealthier Acapulco initially, though weeks later food and aid were delivered to the stricken areas.

the opening say 15 killed supported by ref #5, then says killed many supported ref #6. its a duplicate of the same statement but when you check ref #6 the document says 110 people killed in Oaxaca. sorry guys i've declined GA on this, but if you want me to come back and review again just drop a note on my talk page Gnangarra 08:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Olaf/Pauline tango

[edit]

I'm starting to look at the rainfall from these systems, and it's looking awful complicated. Olaf brought some rain, then Pauline brought more rain, then Pauline's broad circulation aloft drug Olaf back inland. Oy gevalt. These rainfall maps will be tricky...something tells me I'll have to create a combined rainfall map including both storms, in addition to the individual storm total maps. Thegreatdr 02:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, that's not good. Good luck with that. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA

[edit]
  • well written Pass
  • factually accurate Pass
  • broad in its coverage Pass
  • neutral point of view policy Pass
  • stable Pass
  • contains images Pass

Great job!--Rmky87 03:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pic

[edit]

Not a huge deal but why is the CLASS pic in the infobox instead of the NCDC one, which is of much higher quality? -- §HurricaneERICarchive 01:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit]

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after it passed in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Hurricane Pauline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Pauline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_Pauline&oldid=1240873221"