Talk:Hurricane Max (2017)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B-Class review
[edit]- Try to reduce, explain, or wikilink (or some combination thereof) the meteo jargon. No links or context for SSHWS, ridge, tropical wave, vorticity, gyre (you pipe-linked ocean gyre here, but that's entirely different to the sort of gyre you're discussing), convection, eye.
- Copyedit for clarity and flow, paying special attention to redundancies and dangling modifiers and other things that should have been caught before publishing ("Over 1,500 homes were damaged by [...] damage", "One death [...] declared missing".
- One stubby paragraph of met. history seems skimpy for a modern NHC system. By the same token, I'd recommend seeking out more sources of impact info. As it stands, you have just two citations that aren't to the US government. – Juliancolton | Talk 19:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Use el Universal for Spanish sources (it's what I used for MX storms back when I edited in the EPAC). YE Pacific Hurricane 23:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- C-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Low-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- C-Class Pacific hurricane articles
- Low-importance Pacific hurricane articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- C-Class Mexico articles
- Low-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles