Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane John (2006)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHurricane John (2006) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHurricane John (2006) is part of the 2006 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2012.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 21, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 26, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
June 29, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA nomination

[edit]

Strongly support it. I think it is almost, if not, up to A-class. CrazyC83 23:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm going to be asking for a GA review (or I may delist it). It was never considered by someone outside the project, which is one of the points of GAC. Other than that, the article is not A-class material. It needs cleanup, and it's a very recent event. A-class is reserved for those articles that would be ready for a FAC run, and this article is not ready for that. Wait for the TCR. --Coredesat talk! 23:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What? It looks great! Who says we have to wait for the TCR? There is plenty of information and a beyond adequate number of references here. bob rulz 06:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
General consensus agrees that we shouldn't have someone within the project passing articles about the project (failing is a different thing, if someone within the project ffails it then you know it probably has to be worked on). It smacks of corruption. – Chacor 06:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the current climate at WP:GA is suggesting users with expertise on a subject to assess it, even if it means that a WikiProject is assessing its own GAs. This is probably better directed at Wikipedia talk:Good articles instead of here, though. Titoxd(?!?) 06:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean overall. I meant within WPTC. Earlier today I believe there was a general consensus on IRC that it shouldn't be done as such. – Chacor 06:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there was somewhat of a consensus that it shouldn't have been promoted in the way it was. Content aside, John was too recent, and there could be further information that comes in before the TCR comes out. From what I've seen, GAs need to be somewhat stable. --Coredesat talk! 06:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First 24 or so refs

[edit]

...Are broken. This is a serious problem, as that's where much of the information on this hurricane comes from. Does anyone know where those references might be archived somewhere? Although half of the article is still a Good Article, 1/2 of a Good Article won't cut it :/. Homestarmy 13:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The NHC recently updated their archives; the links can be fixed easily. I'll get right on it. – Chacor 13:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. – Chacor 13:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, quick work. Well, now it's all of a Good Article heh. Homestarmy 13:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TCR

[edit]

I posted this on the season talk page, but the John TCR is out. --Coredesat 22:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

I think go for another FA run. Juliancolton (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, wait. Flooding FAC with articles from a single project is inappropriate. --Coredesat 22:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Again, there are no other FACs right now. Fine, I guess I am getting too exited here. I won't FAC any articles right now. Juliancolton (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's nothing personal, but we should work on upgrading existing content before throwing every A-class or GA-class article we have on FAC. --Coredesat 03:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know. I guess I am, just getting ahead of myself again. Juliancolton (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rainfall maps

[edit]

Look for them over the next few days for John. I need to do some searching around for extra data. I thought the spreadsheet had been created a while back, but apparently not. Thegreatdr (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Will they be created for just the United States, or has the Mexican rainfall data been found? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane John (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hurricane John (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane John (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane John (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane John (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hurricane_John_(2006)&oldid=1211226973"