Talk:Hurricane Gerda

Hurricane Gerda has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 11, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Cape Cod and the Islands Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Cape Cod and the Islands (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment

Any damage for the impact section would be nice cause its all rainfall.Mitch azenia 13:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The article is quite an interesting read on a relatively old storm. I believe it meets all of the Good Article criteria, although I have to admit, it did need a pretty good, thorough copyedit (mostly minor grammatical and sentence structure changes, though). Good work on obtaining images for this article, considering the age of the storm. Dr. Cash 07:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Gerda (1969). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311045226/http://repository.wrclib.noaa.gov/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=nws_tech_memos to http://repository.wrclib.noaa.gov/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=nws_tech_memos

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Gerda (1969) → Hurricane Gerda – Only one Atlantic hurricane named Gerda. 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 02:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the target article is a redirect to this article. Laurdecl ^talk 06:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 27 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 16:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Gerda (1969) → Hurricane Gerda – Only hurricane to be ever named Gerda. Not a block evader in above. SMB99thx XD (contribs) 12:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – no other tropical cyclone is named "Gerda", for that matter. ~ KN2731 {talk} 09:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support for reason already given. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 20:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Missing Canada impact

[1]

♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]