Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Flossie (2007)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Flossie (2007) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Flossie (2007) is part of the 2007 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 28, 2013Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Name recommendations

[edit]

I think it should remain Flossie (2007) unless a direct hit is expected with at least the eyewall crossing at least one of the islands (not in the forecast at this point, but in the cone of uncertainty). Should a direct hit come into play, it should be moved to Hurricane Flossie. CrazyC83 15:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NO. Standard Wikipedia and Wikiproject naming guidelines should stay in place. Flossie is a reusable name and does not deserve the main article. Chacor 15:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Chacor is right. It should only get the main article once retired. Of course, if it strikes the islands directly, the odds of it not being retired are pretty much nil. I would, however, be okay with redirecting Hurricane Flossie here if the storm does have a severe impact as none of the other Hurricane Flossies did much. —Cuiviénen 15:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the policy changed since 2005...I just think it should be clarified now to make sure that no one does an unnecessary move. I like the redirect of the main article idea if it is likely going to be retired... CrazyC83 15:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unless it causes several billion in damage (which the 2005 storms did when they got the main article, and for the record I really hope it does not), I think it should stay at Flossie (2007), with the main article remaining where it is. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damage reports

[edit]

Any damage reports yet? Thankfully it did not affect the state as it was predicted to. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHFO will issue a post-storm report, as with any other NWS WFO. Chacor 01:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post season report is out. --Hurricanehink (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followed by the NHC report. Jake52 My island 13:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

[edit]

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "Flossieadv20" :
    • {{cite web|author=Powell|year=2007|title=Hurricane Flossie Discussion 21|publisher=Central Pacific Hurricane Center|accessdate=2007-08-13|url=http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/prod.php?file=/cphc/tcpages/archive/2007/TCDCP2.EP092007.21.0708132045}}
    • {{cite web|author=Houston|year=2007|title=Hurricane Flossie Public Advisory Twenty|publisher=Central Pacific Hurricane Center|accessdate=2007-08-13|url=http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/prod.php?file=/cphc/tcpages/archive/2007/TCPCP2.EP092007.20.0708131447}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Plasticup T/C 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete

[edit]

The MH is incomplete. I'd lower it to stub, but it's well-cited and there's a good bit of impact. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was chatting with Cyclonebiskit about this on the IRC and he said that he forgot all about it. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home , User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Flossie (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Flossie (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]