Talk:Hurricane Florence (2006)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Florence (2006) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hurricane Florence (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Florence (2006) is part of the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 22, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
June 27, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.

Rainfall Image problem

I uploaded the new rainfall image with a corrected track provided by the Canadian Hurricane Center, and it is not showing up as a thumbnail, yet it is visible if you look at the high resolution image. Why would that be? What is the fix? Thegreatdr 21:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A very good question. It might just be a problem with wikimedia in which case itll be fixed with time, or there could have been a problem with the upload. I'd give it a few hours, and if it still doesnt work, contact someone for help (who? I have no idea) -Runningonbrains 21:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nilfanion should be able to fix it. – Ch acor 01:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which he has. – Ch acor 14:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, so trusting ;) I also {{NC}} tagged it.--Nilfanion (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

I asked the author on IRC to fix the only problem with the article, which was a misaligned image. Pass all sections.Mi tch 00:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good article(lack of pictures

I don't think this should be a good article because it does not have enough pictures and looks too short to me. Can anyone re-assess this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.224.179 (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are five images, and the storm never made landfall, so there wouldn't be all that much info. What do you think is missing? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no size requirement for GA. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 21:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Florence (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Florence (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611125232/http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/bulletins_all_e.html to http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/bulletins_all_e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]